Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.algebra.help > #4867 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-19 10:30 -0300 |
| Last post | 2017-08-10 13:03 -0300 |
| Articles | 6 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.algebra.help
on a compound interest problem Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-03-19 10:30 -0300
Re: on a compound interest problem Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2017-03-19 13:11 -0700
Re: on a compound interest problem Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-03-19 20:15 -0300
Re: on a compound interest problem Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 10:30 +0300
Re: on a compound interest problem Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 10:34 +0300
Re: on a compound interest problem Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-08-10 13:03 -0300
| From | Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-19 10:30 -0300 |
| Subject | on a compound interest problem |
| Message-ID | <867f3lo0m3.fsf@toledo.com> |
I say this problem's formula is incorrect, but I'd appreciate an expert confirmation. Problem. Consider an amount q invested for n years at an interest rate j. The total amount after n years is given by the formula gf = q * ((1 + j/100) + (1 + j/100)^2 + ... + (1 + j/100)^n). [...] I think that's not correct. The initial amount is q. After 1 year, the amount is q (1 + 1/100). After 2 years, the amount is q (1 + 1/100)^2 Why are they adding in their formula? That formula seems like a very good investment. In fact, too good to be true. Thank you! (*) Note to self After 2 years at 10% with q = 100. (* 100 (+ 1.10 (expt 1.10 2))) = 231. (It should be 121.)
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-19 13:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <paptcc9hhg8cejff2ti6j46im0djk400lu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #4867 |
On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 10:30:12 -0300, Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> wrote: >I say this problem's formula is incorrect, but I'd appreciate an expert >confirmation. > >Problem. Consider an amount q invested for n years at an interest rate j. >The total amount after n years is given by the formula > > gf = q * ((1 + j/100) + (1 + j/100)^2 + ... + (1 + j/100)^n). This is the formula for q invested **each year** over a length of n years. >I think that's not correct. The initial amount is q. After 1 year, the >amount is > > q (1 + 1/100). This formula is for q invested **once** for n years. >After 2 years, the amount is > > q (1 + 1/100)^2 > >Why are they adding in their formula? That formula seems like a very >good investment. In fact, too good to be true. > >Thank you! > >(*) Note to self > >After 2 years at 10% with q = 100. (* 100 (+ 1.10 (expt 1.10 2))) = 231. >(It should be 121.) -- Remove del for email
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-19 20:15 -0300 |
| Message-ID | <86o9wwn9im.fsf@toledo.com> |
| In reply to | #4868 |
Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> writes: > On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 10:30:12 -0300, Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> > wrote: > >>I say this problem's formula is incorrect, but I'd appreciate an expert >>confirmation. >> >>Problem. Consider an amount q invested for n years at an interest rate j. >>The total amount after n years is given by the formula >> >> gf = q * ((1 + j/100) + (1 + j/100)^2 + ... + (1 + j/100)^n). > > This is the formula for q invested **each year** over a length of n > years. That's probably what the problem meant. Thank you. [...]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-06 10:30 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <oh5lcf$kjs$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #4870 |
On 3/20/17 02:15, Daniel Bastos wrote: > Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> writes: > >> On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 10:30:12 -0300, Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I say this problem's formula is incorrect, but I'd appreciate an expert >>> confirmation. >>> >>> Problem. Consider an amount q invested for n years at an interest rate j. >>> The total amount after n years is given by the formula >>> >>> gf = q * ((1 + j/100) + (1 + j/100)^2 + ... + (1 + j/100)^n). >> >> This is the formula for q invested **each year** over a length of n >> years. > > That's probably what the problem meant. You can see that by opening the brackets. Using a simple example, where q = 100, n = 3, and rate 0.05 # invest 100 in the first year, and get the first year's future value of FV = 100 * 1.05 = 105 # at the end of the first year you add again 100 to those 105, and get at the end of the second year: (100 + 105) * 1.05 = 215.25 # at the end of the second year you add again 100 to 215.25, and get at the end of the third year: (100 + 215.25) * 1.05 = 331.01 -- Respectfully, Alla
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-06 10:34 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <oh5lkr$kjs$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #4976 |
On 6/6/17 10:30, Alla wrote: > On 3/20/17 02:15, Daniel Bastos wrote: >> Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> writes: >> >>> On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 10:30:12 -0300, Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I say this problem's formula is incorrect, but I'd appreciate an expert >>>> confirmation. >>>> >>>> Problem. Consider an amount q invested for n years at an interest >>>> rate j. >>>> The total amount after n years is given by the formula >>>> >>>> gf = q * ((1 + j/100) + (1 + j/100)^2 + ... + (1 + j/100)^n). >>> >>> This is the formula for q invested **each year** over a length of n >>> years. >> >> That's probably what the problem meant. > > You can see that by opening the brackets. > Using a simple example, where q = 100, n = 3, and rate 0.05 > > # invest 100 in the first year, and get the first year's future value of > FV = 100 * 1.05 = 105 > > # at the end of the first year you add again 100 to those 105, and get > at the end of the second year: > (100 + 105) * 1.05 = 215.25 > > # at the end of the second year you add again 100 to 215.25, and get at > the end of the third year: > (100 + 215.25) * 1.05 = 331.01 > Sorry! I have only now noticed that it was posted in March, so I guess the issue is solved long time ago. -- Respectfully, Alla
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-10 13:03 -0300 |
| Message-ID | <861soj76lo.fsf@toledo.com> |
| In reply to | #4977 |
Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com> writes: > On 6/6/17 10:30, Alla wrote: >> On 3/20/17 02:15, Daniel Bastos wrote: >>> Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> writes: >>> >>>> On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 10:30:12 -0300, Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I say this problem's formula is incorrect, but I'd appreciate an expert >>>>> confirmation. >>>>> >>>>> Problem. Consider an amount q invested for n years at an >>>>> interest rate j. >>>>> The total amount after n years is given by the formula >>>>> >>>>> gf = q * ((1 + j/100) + (1 + j/100)^2 + ... + (1 + j/100)^n). >>>> >>>> This is the formula for q invested **each year** over a length of n >>>> years. >>> >>> That's probably what the problem meant. >> >> You can see that by opening the brackets. >> Using a simple example, where q = 100, n = 3, and rate 0.05 >> >> # invest 100 in the first year, and get the first year's future value of >> FV = 100 * 1.05 = 105 >> >> # at the end of the first year you add again 100 to those 105, and >> get at the end of the second year: >> (100 + 105) * 1.05 = 215.25 >> >> # at the end of the second year you add again 100 to 215.25, and get >> at the end of the third year: >> (100 + 215.25) * 1.05 = 331.01 > > Sorry! I have only now noticed that it was posted in March, so I guess > the issue is solved long time ago. The OP is still here and appreciates your posting. Thank you!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | alt.algebra.help
csiph-web