Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #889746

How Monkeys see the World (Re: What is it like to be a Bat?)

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,

One could now assume that this dualism
prevents artificial intelligence.  Because
seeing “pink” leads to feeling “pink”.
In this respect, this is also a very

interesting book, perhaps of historical interest?

How Monkeys See the World
”A fascinating intellectual odyssey and a
superb summary of where science stands.”
https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo3774491.html

My guess ChatGPT proves that dualism does
not prevent artificial intelligence.  And
how does ChatGPT manage it?

I suspect the Knowlegde Acquisition
Bottleneck has been cracked.  Even though
ChatGPT doesn't have a "Pink" feeling,

it still has the semantic network of "Pink"
and can have a say.  It was already heard through
the grapevine in 2018 that something was being

done, but back then it was a rather skeptical vote:

Did We Just Replace the ‘Knowledge Bottleneck’
With a ‘Data Bottleneck’?
https://cacm.acm.org/blogcacm/did-we-just-replace-the-knowledge-bottleneck-with-a-data-bottleneck/

The "Too good to be true, in fact." turned into
a "Heureka, it works!" right before our eyes.
The date of birth was:

Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3 (GPT-3)
OpenAI - 28. Mai 2020, Wired reported that
GPT-3 "sends shivers down spines in Silicon Valley."
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_Pre-trained_Transformer_3#Rezeption

Have Fun!

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> So this study colleague with his Flavia, the female
> mathematician, has given me something to think about.
> Why don't I react exactly the same as him?
> 
> Maybe he's a different strain of homosapiens?
> And therefore rules differently than me, at least
> I never had a fetish for female mathematicians,
> 
> a contradiction to determinism?
> Ha ha, now I can feed you something again:
> 
> What is it Like to be a Bat?
> the hard problem of consciousness
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaZbCctlll4
> 
> Bye
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>> Just reading:
>>
>> "Deep ecologists reject any mechanical
>> or computer model of nature, and see
>> the Earth as a living organism, which
>> should be treated and understood accordingly"
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_ecology#Sources
>>
>> Now that we enter the age of AI. What
>> about an AI Computer model. An AI Earth
>> Computer model? Any pointers?
> 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-06-04 18:03 +0200
  Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-06-04 18:14 +0200
    Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-06-04 18:22 +0200
      Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-06-04 18:49 +0200
  Happy Birthday 75 Years of Artificial Intelligence Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-10-21 14:33 +0200
    Re: Happy Birthday 75 Years of Artificial Intelligence Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-10-24 23:38 -0500
  How Monkeys see the World (Re: What is it like to be a Bat?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-10-23 22:44 +0200
  Highly bred Hackers: Wallowing in enlightenment (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-10-26 17:47 +0200
    Re: Highly bred Hackers: Wallowing in enlightenment (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-10-27 22:04 -0500
  The Bee Clock Model (Re: FYI: New Journal NAI) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-11-06 17:38 +0100
  ChatGPT for the Fint Stones: Bloomberg (Was: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-11-11 22:27 +0100
  "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-12-01 01:11 +0100
    Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-11-30 21:58 -0600
      Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-12-01 11:37 +0100
        Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 13:17 -0600
        Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 13:27 -0600
          Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 13:32 -0600
        Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 13:45 -0600
  Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023) (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-11-30 21:38 -0600

csiph-web