Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #890299

Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023))

From Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023))
Date 2024-11-30 21:58 -0600
Organization Modern Human
Message-ID <vigmsl$l90i$3@solani.org> (permalink)
References <v3ndsa$1782o$3@solani.org> <vig8ok$847h$4@solani.org> <vig9j8$l48h$3@solani.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/30/24 6:11 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
> Who do I use as a programming companion, stackoverflow
> or ChatGPT. I think ChatGPT is the clear winner


Neither.

One is a joke, the other is not reliable.

The few people in stackoverflow aren't there to tell you what the 
solution to a particularly difficult, or novel, question is. They're 
there to learn from _you_. In interacting with those Bozos you'll end up 
struggling more and more to find the solution because of how idiotically 
they behave and try to make you hopeless, and when you at last find the 
solution all by yourself, they know you'll be tempted to show it to them 
to prove your point. And that's how those suckers suck others.

Even the now defective Google Search beats stackoverflow. You just have 
to ignore its numerous references to stackoverflow.

I mentioned "the few people in stackoverflow" because 99 percent of 
people who are nominally members have left that site forever and out of 
disgust. But SO keeps their membership alive to boast a large pool of 
members. They're actually a bunch of 10 or 15 people, all of them 
moderators, all of them cluless like any moderator actually is.

Chatgpt is definitely unreliable. It can only throw you on some form of 
starting point that makes some sense. You must do the rest, including 
using other starting points.





Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

"superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-12-01 01:11 +0100
  Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-11-30 21:58 -0600
    Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-12-01 11:37 +0100
      Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 13:17 -0600
      Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 13:27 -0600
        Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 13:32 -0600
      Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 13:45 -0600

csiph-web