Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.electronics.design > #725745

Re: nuclear clock better then 'atomic' clock?? What's in a name...

Show all headers | View raw

On a sunny day (Thu, 5 Sep 2024 10:32:04 +0100) it happened Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote in <vbbtqk$9js1$1@dont-email.me>:

>On 05/09/2024 06:20, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>> Major leap for nuclear clock paves way for ultraprecise timekeeping
>>   https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/240904130817.htm
>>   September 4, 2024
>> Source:
>>   National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
>> Summary:
>>   Nuclear clocks would measure time based on changes inside an atom's nucleus,
>>   which would make them less sensitive to external disturbances and potentially
>>   more accurate than atomic clocks.
>>   These clocks could lead to improved timekeeping and navigation,
>>   faster internet speeds, and advances in fundamental physics research.
>>   Scientists have demonstrated key components of a nuclear clock,
>>   such as precise frequency measurements of an energy jump in a thorium-229
>>   nucleus.
>> 
>> future babble?
>> Paper is 25 dollars measured at today's nuclear inflation time, eh speed
>> I would have thought that NIST, financed by public money,
>> would publish their papers for free for thee.
>
>Nature is an expensive journal to run and publish. They charge for 
>access. This is getting less common many are now free access.
>
>The paper you want here isn't on arxiv that I can see but this one is:
>
>https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13023

Cool! got the paper, reading it.

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

nuclear clock better then  'atomic' clock?? What's in a name... Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2024-09-05 05:20 +0000
  Re: nuclear clock better then 'atomic' clock?? What's in a name... Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2024-09-05 10:11 +0200
    Re: nuclear clock better then 'atomic' clock?? What's in a name... Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2024-09-05 09:51 +0000
  Re: nuclear clock better then 'atomic' clock?? What's in a name... Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2024-09-05 10:32 +0100
    Re: nuclear clock better then 'atomic' clock?? What's in a name... Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2024-09-05 10:03 +0000

csiph-web