Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Array implementation of Stack |
| Date | 2011-06-22 08:41 +0000 |
| Organization | Stack Usenet News Service |
| Message-ID | <slrnj03al5.29pm.willem@toad.stack.nl> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <lnmxhg1ohk.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <slrnivmrub.1i40.willem@toad.stack.nl> <4dfc01c7$0$21771$a729d347@news.telepac.pt> <slrnivostk.2vnc.willem@toad.stack.nl> <4e015801$0$1785$a729d347@news.telepac.pt> |
Rui Maciel wrote:
) in a scenario where "expanding the stack and setting the top element"
) are separate operations, the "expanding the stack" bit involves allocating
) memory and nothing more, without having the faintest guarantee that your
) program will ever use that memory or even initialize the memory it
) allocates.
Yes, and ?
) if you set your push() to do nothing more than allocate memory, then you
) only gain a way to needlessly allocate memory to your stack which you may or
) may not use.
You're contradicting yourself. It's only needless if you don't use it.
)> )> pop() without a return value would have to discard the value it
)> )> takes from the stack.
)> )
)> ) Well. that's the point of pop(). You store your data with push(), you
)> ) access the data with top() and you discard your data with pop().
)>
)> Do you know what "begging the question" means ?
)>
)> Here's an example for you:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Are you really too stupid to read properly ?
)> The point of pop() is to give you the top element of the stack.
)
) No, it is not. That's what top() is designed to do. Do you even know what
) a stack is?
BEGGING THE QUESTION AGAIN.
We're arguing about what the different stack operations should do.
So using "it's defined to do that" is begging the question.
There, I hope I spelled it out for you enough.
)> So there's no point in having a separate top() operation.
)
) For you to make such a claim then it becomes quite clear that you never used
) a stack.
You're an idiot too, dear.
SaSW, Willem
--
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be
drugged or something..
No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Array implementation of Stack Mark Bluemel <mark_bluemel@pobox.com> - 2011-06-16 15:05 +0100
Re: Array implementation of Stack Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 20:12 +0100
Re: Array implementation of Stack Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-06-16 19:35 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 22:44 +0100
Re: Array implementation of Stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-16 15:26 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-06-17 14:10 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-17 08:12 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-06-17 15:16 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-17 10:46 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-06-17 12:22 -0600
Re: Array implementation of Stack Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-18 02:35 +0100
Re: Array implementation of Stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-17 19:38 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-06-18 09:45 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2011-06-18 10:18 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 21:43 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-18 11:40 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 03:46 +0100
Re: Array implementation of Stack Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-06-22 08:41 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-22 08:50 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-06-22 16:30 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 16:37 +0100
Re: Array implementation of Stack Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-06-23 16:27 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-23 10:08 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-24 04:13 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-24 07:47 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-24 10:13 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-24 21:56 -0400
Re: Array implementation of Stack "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-24 23:00 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-25 07:03 -0400
Re: Array implementation of Stack "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-25 08:49 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-06-23 20:49 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-06-24 13:26 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-24 10:25 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-06-22 20:40 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-06-23 01:31 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 15:53 +0100
Re: Array implementation of Stack Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-06-23 15:02 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2011-06-22 09:06 -0500
Re: Array implementation of Stack Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 15:39 +0100
Re: Array implementation of Stack Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-06-23 14:57 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2011-06-23 19:19 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-24 01:44 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2011-06-24 21:55 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-24 05:21 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-23 08:25 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-06-23 16:57 +0100
Re: Array implementation of Stack luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-23 12:49 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-06-23 22:19 +0100
Re: Array implementation of Stack luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-24 01:35 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2011-06-23 22:03 -0500
Re: Array implementation of Stack Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-06-24 11:47 +0100
Re: Array implementation of Stack Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 16:52 +0100
Re: Array implementation of Stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-23 10:11 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-17 10:55 -0500
Re: Array implementation of Stack "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-17 13:00 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-06-17 20:24 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-17 14:24 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Ralf Damaschke <rwspam@gmx.de> - 2011-06-17 21:57 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-17 16:07 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Ralf Damaschke <rwspam@gmx.de> - 2011-06-18 16:59 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2011-06-18 11:05 +0100
Re: Array implementation of Stack Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-06-18 09:55 +0000
Re: Array implementation of Stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-18 11:49 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-22 10:22 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-06-23 09:02 +0200
Re: Array implementation of Stack "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-06-23 09:57 +0200
Re: Array implementation of Stack "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-24 03:00 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-24 00:16 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> - 2011-06-16 13:35 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-17 08:50 +1200
Re: Array implementation of Stack "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> - 2011-06-16 14:15 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> - 2011-06-16 14:19 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 22:51 +0100
Re: Array implementation of Stack "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> - 2011-06-16 15:27 -0700
Re: Array implementation of Stack Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 22:43 +0100
csiph-web