Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #1788
| From | forthrightly@no-email.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] |
| Date | 2011-05-05 14:38 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <slrnis5dii.vgc.localhost@example.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <Keudnc2lPsYW_lzQnZ2dnUVZ8kqdnZ2d@supernews.com> <13879995-ef2d-4e00-a6bb-6742cdedf4ae@s41g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <pIqdnYzwtt2B_F_QnZ2dnUVZ7tidnZ2d@supernews.com> <slrnis58g6.vgc.localhost@example.org> <D5OdnbUGe8WyM1_QnZ2dnUVZ8nOdnZ2d@supernews.com> |
On 2011-05-05, Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> wrote: > forthrightly@no-email.com wrote: >> On 2011-05-05, Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> wrote: >>> Interesting. I can't imagine any circumstances in which I'd want all >>> the 32-bit libraries installed by default -- there's an awful lot of >>> them. There's nothing to stop you doing it yourself at install >>> time by installing all the *i686* libraries from the DVD using RPM. >> >> I agree with what you said. In fact I don't want any of the 32 bit >> libs on my systems and I've many friends who agree with that. I feel >> multilib Linux is just an upgrade mechanism from the days when apps >> wouldn't build in 64 bit mode. Now that's mostly over and if you're >> running newish hardware there isn't any reason (besides Acroread and >> Skype) to run 32 bit at all. It really keeps down the bloat. > > Sure, but if you're using this stuff, why do you care? Using what stuff? I abandoned Acroread and Skype when I installed my first pure 64 a few years ago. > For SwiftForth it's not necessary to install much more than 32-bit glibc. First I've heard of it. > If you don't want even to do that, I think it's fair to accuse you of > being petty. You're out of line Andrew. Why is your business what I do? > Equally, I don't understand why Krishna would want to install every 32-bit > library. Surely the happy medium is somewhere in-between. For you perhaps it is. Each of us is certainly entitled to run as he likes without being insulted. Harry
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-04 10:07 +0000
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-04 05:28 -0500
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-04 11:41 +0000
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-04 09:32 -0500
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2011-05-04 11:18 -0700
[off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-05 03:34 -0500
Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-05 13:11 +0000
Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-05 09:03 -0500
Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-05 14:38 +0000
Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-05 10:15 -0500
Re: 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-07 03:47 -0700
Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-05-05 14:17 +0000
Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-05 14:40 +0000
Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2011-05-06 01:28 +0000
Re: 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2011-05-05 06:59 -0700
Re: 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-05 10:12 -0500
Re: 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2011-05-06 20:34 -0700
Re: 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-07 02:33 -0500
Re: 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2011-05-07 18:03 -0700
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-04 19:40 +0000
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2011-05-04 14:26 +0000
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-04 09:52 -0500
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-05-04 12:09 -0700
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2011-05-04 10:44 -1000
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-04 21:18 +0000
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-04 22:03 -0700
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-05 13:16 +0000
csiph-web