Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #1781
| From | forthrightly@no-email.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] |
| Date | 2011-05-05 13:11 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <slrnis58g6.vgc.localhost@example.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <e-udnWszG93et1zQnZ2dnUVZ8m2dnZ2d@supernews.com> <slrnis2eqq.mmm.localhost@example.org> <Keudnc2lPsYW_lzQnZ2dnUVZ8kqdnZ2d@supernews.com> <13879995-ef2d-4e00-a6bb-6742cdedf4ae@s41g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <pIqdnYzwtt2B_F_QnZ2dnUVZ7tidnZ2d@supernews.com> |
On 2011-05-05, Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> wrote: > Interesting. I can't imagine any circumstances in which I'd want all > the 32-bit libraries installed by default -- there's an awful lot of > them. There's nothing to stop you doing it yourself at install > time by installing all the *i686* libraries from the DVD using RPM. > > Andrew. Hi Andrew I agree with what you said. In fact I don't want any of the 32 bit libs on my systems and I've many friends who agree with that. I feel multilib Linux is just an upgrade mechanism from the days when apps wouldn't build in 64 bit mode. Now that's mostly over and if you're running newish hardware there isn't any reason (besides Acroread and Skype) to run 32 bit at all. It really keeps down the bloat. If you do custom installs like I do, not installing everything and the kitchen sink, it makes sense not to install the 32 bit libs on a 64 bit distro. I'm quite happy Pat decided to build Slackware as either pure 32 or pure 64 as it reduces complexity and saves quite a bit of room when you have a single lib distro. I suppose hapless Windows victims who are starting out with Linux and use package managed distros and don't compile their apps from source don't know the difference and don't care but for Linux people who've been using it for years as we have, we often like to control what goes on our systems and what doesn't. Cheers, Harry
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-04 10:07 +0000
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-04 05:28 -0500
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-04 11:41 +0000
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-04 09:32 -0500
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2011-05-04 11:18 -0700
[off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-05 03:34 -0500
Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-05 13:11 +0000
Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-05 09:03 -0500
Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-05 14:38 +0000
Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-05 10:15 -0500
Re: 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-07 03:47 -0700
Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-05-05 14:17 +0000
Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-05 14:40 +0000
Re: [off-topic] 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2011-05-06 01:28 +0000
Re: 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2011-05-05 06:59 -0700
Re: 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-05 10:12 -0500
Re: 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2011-05-06 20:34 -0700
Re: 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-07 02:33 -0500
Re: 32-bit libs [Was: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only!] Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2011-05-07 18:03 -0700
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-04 19:40 +0000
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2011-05-04 14:26 +0000
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-05-04 09:52 -0500
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-05-04 12:09 -0700
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2011-05-04 10:44 -1000
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-04 21:18 +0000
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-04 22:03 -0700
Re: SwiftForth Linux eval is 32 bit only! forthrightly@no-email.com - 2011-05-05 13:16 +0000
csiph-web