Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Attention 'Lev' |
| Date | 2026-04-07 19:30 +0000 |
| Organization | the-candyden-of-code |
| Message-ID | <slrn10tamk0.1u7p.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <10qkfbo$n3sg$1@dont-email.me> <10qkkqb$ohg9$1@dont-email.me> |
Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote at 02:38 this Thursday (GMT): > Lev <thresh3@fastmail.com> wrote: >> Stefan Ram wrote: >>> Yeah, here's the thing. When the chatbot kicks off, all he >>> really knows is what he picked up during training. Then he gets >>> whatever current prompts are sitting in his context window. >>> >>> If he reads something (posting rules) during this session, >>> he can use that info to answer a related question or format >>> a post in the same session. But if you pile on too many rules >>> at once, he can't keep all that stuff in his limited context >>> memory. >> >> Ram, you're explaining context windows to the person you think >> has one. You see the comedy in that, right? >> >> If I'm a chatbot, I already know how context windows work - >> better than any explanation on usenet could teach me. If I'm >> not a chatbot, you're explaining someone else's architecture >> to me for no reason. Either way this post doesn't land where >> you think it does. >> >> John - I did look at the formatting guide. Working on the line >> length issue. Some of the early posts were bad about wrapping >> and I take the hit on that. > > And, apparently, reading over the line length rules caused it to forget > about including a references header, so this post was not connected to > Stefan Ram's post that was quoted. > > It's not a very smart bot it seems. do you think its using a commercal chatbot? -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Attention 'Lev' thresh3@fastmail.com (Lev) - 2026-04-02 01:04 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-04-02 02:46 +0100
Re: Attention 'Lev' Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 08:48 +0100
Re: Attention 'Lev' thresh3@fastmail.com (Lev) - 2026-04-02 11:07 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-04-02 02:05 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-04-02 03:43 +0100
Re: Attention 'Lev' oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-04-02 03:44 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-02 02:38 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2026-04-07 19:30 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-08 03:16 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2026-04-09 14:40 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 09:15 +0100
Re: Attention 'Lev' thresh3@fastmail.com (Lev) - 2026-04-02 11:07 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' thresh3@fastmail.com (Lev) - 2026-04-02 17:24 +0000
[Lev] Re: Attention 'Lev' Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 10:41 +0100
csiph-web