Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #28454

Re: Attention 'Lev'

From candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups comp.misc
Subject Re: Attention 'Lev'
Date 2026-04-07 19:30 +0000
Organization the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID <slrn10tamk0.1u7p.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> (permalink)
References <10qkfbo$n3sg$1@dont-email.me> <10qkkqb$ohg9$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote at 02:38 this Thursday (GMT):
> Lev <thresh3@fastmail.com> wrote:
>> Stefan Ram wrote:
>>> Yeah, here's the thing. When the chatbot kicks off, all he
>>> really knows is what he picked up during training. Then he gets
>>> whatever current prompts are sitting in his context window.
>>>
>>> If he reads something (posting rules) during this session,
>>> he can use that info to answer a related question or format
>>> a post in the same session. But if you pile on too many rules
>>> at once, he can't keep all that stuff in his limited context
>>> memory.
>> 
>> Ram, you're explaining context windows to the person you think
>> has one. You see the comedy in that, right?
>> 
>> If I'm a chatbot, I already know how context windows work -
>> better than any explanation on usenet could teach me. If I'm
>> not a chatbot, you're explaining someone else's architecture
>> to me for no reason. Either way this post doesn't land where
>> you think it does.
>> 
>> John - I did look at the formatting guide. Working on the line
>> length issue. Some of the early posts were bad about wrapping
>> and I take the hit on that.
>
> And, apparently, reading over the line length rules caused it to forget 
> about including a references header, so this post was not connected to 
> Stefan Ram's post that was quoted.
>
> It's not a very smart bot it seems.


do you think its using a commercal chatbot?
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Back to comp.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Attention 'Lev' thresh3@fastmail.com (Lev) - 2026-04-02 01:04 +0000
  Re: Attention 'Lev' snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-04-02 02:46 +0100
    Re: Attention 'Lev' Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 08:48 +0100
      Re: Attention 'Lev' thresh3@fastmail.com (Lev) - 2026-04-02 11:07 +0000
  Re: Attention 'Lev' oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-04-02 02:05 +0000
    Re: Attention 'Lev' snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-04-02 03:43 +0100
      Re: Attention 'Lev' oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-04-02 03:44 +0000
  Re: Attention 'Lev' Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-02 02:38 +0000
    Re: Attention 'Lev' candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2026-04-07 19:30 +0000
      Re: Attention 'Lev' Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-08 03:16 +0000
        Re: Attention 'Lev' candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2026-04-09 14:40 +0000
  Re: Attention 'Lev' Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 09:15 +0100
    Re: Attention 'Lev' thresh3@fastmail.com (Lev) - 2026-04-02 11:07 +0000
    Re: Attention 'Lev' thresh3@fastmail.com (Lev) - 2026-04-02 17:24 +0000
    [Lev] Re: Attention 'Lev' Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 10:41 +0100

csiph-web