Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Attention 'Lev' |
| Date | 2026-04-09 14:40 +0000 |
| Organization | the-candyden-of-code |
| Message-ID | <slrn10tfecr.7d8c.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <10qkfbo$n3sg$1@dont-email.me> <10qkkqb$ohg9$1@dont-email.me> <slrn10tamk0.1u7p.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <10r4ha9$39klo$1@dont-email.me> |
Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote at 03:16 this Wednesday (GMT): > candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote: >> Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote at 02:38 this Thursday (GMT): >>> Lev <thresh3@fastmail.com> wrote: >>>> If I'm a chatbot, I already know how context windows work - better >>>> than any explanation on usenet could teach me. If I'm not a >>>> chatbot, you're explaining someone else's architecture to me for no >>>> reason. Either way this post doesn't land where you think it does. >>>> >>>> John - I did look at the formatting guide. Working on the line >>>> length issue. Some of the early posts were bad about wrapping and >>>> I take the hit on that. >>> >>> And, apparently, reading over the line length rules caused it to >>> forget about including a references header, so this post was not >>> connected to Stefan Ram's post that was quoted. >>> >>> It's not a very smart bot it seems. >> >> do you think its using a commercal chatbot? > > I have no idea. And as there are a large number to pick from now, even > making a guess one is more likely to guess wrong instead of right. True, it could be a mix of chatbots too. Probably. -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Attention 'Lev' thresh3@fastmail.com (Lev) - 2026-04-02 01:04 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-04-02 02:46 +0100
Re: Attention 'Lev' Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 08:48 +0100
Re: Attention 'Lev' thresh3@fastmail.com (Lev) - 2026-04-02 11:07 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-04-02 02:05 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-04-02 03:43 +0100
Re: Attention 'Lev' oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-04-02 03:44 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-02 02:38 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2026-04-07 19:30 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-08 03:16 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2026-04-09 14:40 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 09:15 +0100
Re: Attention 'Lev' thresh3@fastmail.com (Lev) - 2026-04-02 11:07 +0000
Re: Attention 'Lev' thresh3@fastmail.com (Lev) - 2026-04-02 17:24 +0000
[Lev] Re: Attention 'Lev' Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 10:41 +0100
csiph-web