Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.comp.software.firefox > #233
| From | jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.firefox |
| Subject | Re: Current profile [OT] |
| Date | 2021-04-15 16:14 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <s59l95$7bd$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <idomtdFlfvkU1@mid.individual.net> <idp2vtFnp2bU1@mid.individual.net> <s57lnm$ves$1@dont-email.me> <s57omg$ouc$1@dont-email.me> <s57vn5$9sj$1@dont-email.me> |
On 15/04/2021 01:00, Jeff Barnett wrote: > On 4/14/2021 4:00 PM, Dave Royal wrote: >> On 14 Apr 2021 15:10:12 -0600 Jeff Barnett wrote: >>> [On 4/14/2021 2:52 PM, Ken Blake wrote:] >>>> On 4/14/2021 1:43 PM, WaltS48 wrote: >>>>> On 4/14/21 1:26 PM, s|b wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:21:06 -0400, WaltS48 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Replaced Pan on my systems ages ago. >>>>>> Pan isn't that bad. >> >> I used Pan for several years when I stopped using SeaMonkey. It has a >> decent scoring system and sub-thread handling. It was fine, but a year >> or two ago on my xfce system it became buggy - the GUI part. Wouldn't >> stay the same size - went off the edge of the display. I still use it >> occasionally. I've also tried XPN, knode, and sylpheed among GUI >> clients but generally use tin on Linux and SFOS. >>> >>> What you say is indeed the common (and I believe, accurate) view of >>> traditional newsgroup rules. However, I have always mused about whether >>> this makes sense in groups dealing with products that deploy HTML, e.g., >>> TB and FF groups. How much easier is it to present a problem in HTML if >>> it is involved with that problem? >>> >> But some newsreaders cannot read html. It's not a requirement of an NNTP >> client. I'm only seeing and responding to the plain text. So it may be >> easier to present the problem, but some readers will find it difficult >> to understand. >> >> Usernet is a plain text system. If you want or need to use html, use a >> forum. I like usernet - but I'm happy to use forums too. > The Mozilla newsgroups recently killed were plain text too. No they weren't. If you look at m.s.f and m.s.t on the news.mozilla.org server (they are still there for reading), you will find several posts in HTML by Good Guy in both of them. If only plain text had been allowed, Chris Ilias would not have let them through. -- Jeff
Back to alt.comp.software.firefox | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Current profile Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-04-10 18:04 -0600
Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-11 00:18 +0000
Re: Current profile dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> - 2021-04-11 02:26 +0200
Re: Current profile Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2021-04-11 07:05 +0100
Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-11 09:40 +0100
Re: Current profile WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-11 09:23 -0400
Re: Current profile Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2021-04-11 15:17 +0100
Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-11 15:38 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-14 15:59 +0200
Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-14 19:26 +0200
Re: Current profile [OT] Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-04-14 13:52 -0700
Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-14 16:59 -0400
Re: Current profile [OT] Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-14 21:32 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-15 21:48 +0200
Re: Current profile [OT] Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2021-04-16 07:21 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-17 15:55 +0200
Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-17 10:17 -0400
Re: Current profile [OT] Ken Whiton <kenwhiton@surfglobal.net.INVAL> - 2021-04-15 23:17 -0400
Re: Current profile [OT] Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-04-14 15:10 -0600
Re: Current profile [OT] Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-14 22:00 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-14 18:21 -0400
Re: Current profile [OT] "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-14 23:41 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-14 20:39 -0400
Re: Current profile [OT] "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-15 01:25 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2021-04-14 17:44 -0700
Re: Current profile [OT] Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-04-14 16:25 -0700
Re: Current profile [OT] Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-04-14 18:00 -0600
Re: Current profile [OT] "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-15 00:27 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-15 06:48 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-15 16:14 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-15 09:44 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-15 09:53 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-15 12:19 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-15 08:04 -0400
Re: Current profile [OT] "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-15 13:01 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-15 13:59 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2021-04-15 23:32 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-04-15 16:39 -0700
Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-15 21:44 +0200
Re: Current profile Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2021-04-15 08:11 +0000
Re: Current profile Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-04-11 11:30 -0600
Re: Current profile "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-14 16:04 +0200
Re: Current profile Ken Whiton <kenwhiton@surfglobal.net.INVAL> - 2021-04-15 15:26 -0400
Re: Current profile Sailfish <sailfish@unforgettable.com> - 2021-04-11 19:14 -0700
Re: Current profile Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2021-04-12 07:34 +0100
Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-12 10:38 +0100
Re: Current profile Jeff Layman <jmlayman@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-12 15:08 +0100
Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-12 15:49 +0100
Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-12 17:29 +0000
Re: Current profile Jeff Layman <jmlayman@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-12 22:06 +0100
Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-12 21:28 +0000
Re: Current profile Mint User <mint@aio3.org> - 2021-04-12 22:48 +0100
Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-12 23:12 +0000
Re: Current profile WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-12 18:28 -0400
Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-13 12:05 +0000
Re: Current profile Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-13 07:25 +0100
Re: Current profile Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-13 06:29 +0000
Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-13 08:38 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-14 16:04 +0200
csiph-web