Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.comp.software.firefox > #213
| From | Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.firefox |
| Subject | Re: Current profile [OT] |
| Date | 2021-04-14 18:00 -0600 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <s57vn5$9sj$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <oTCdI.41382$J_5.4519@fx46.iad> <idomtdFlfvkU1@mid.individual.net> <idp2vtFnp2bU1@mid.individual.net> <s57lnm$ves$1@dont-email.me> <s57omg$ouc$1@dont-email.me> |
On 4/14/2021 4:00 PM, Dave Royal wrote: > On 14 Apr 2021 15:10:12 -0600 Jeff Barnett wrote: >> [On 4/14/2021 2:52 PM, Ken Blake wrote:] >>> On 4/14/2021 1:43 PM, WaltS48 wrote: >>>> On 4/14/21 1:26 PM, s|b wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:21:06 -0400, WaltS48 wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Replaced Pan on my systems ages ago. >>>>> Pan isn't that bad. > > I used Pan for several years when I stopped using SeaMonkey. It has a > decent scoring system and sub-thread handling. It was fine, but a year > or two ago on my xfce system it became buggy - the GUI part. Wouldn't > stay the same size - went off the edge of the display. I still use it > occasionally. I've also tried XPN, knode, and sylpheed among GUI > clients but generally use tin on Linux and SFOS. >> >> What you say is indeed the common (and I believe, accurate) view of >> traditional newsgroup rules. However, I have always mused about whether >> this makes sense in groups dealing with products that deploy HTML, e.g., >> TB and FF groups. How much easier is it to present a problem in HTML if >> it is involved with that problem? >> > But some newsreaders cannot read html. It's not a requirement of an NNTP > client. I'm only seeing and responding to the plain text. So it may be > easier to present the problem, but some readers will find it difficult > to understand. > > Usernet is a plain text system. If you want or need to use html, use a > forum. I like usernet - but I'm happy to use forums too. The Mozilla newsgroups recently killed were plain text too. They were only about Mozilla products, all of which to my knowledge allowed HTML. I think this admiration for the rustic good old days is rather silly. -- Jeff Barnett
Back to alt.comp.software.firefox | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Current profile Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-04-10 18:04 -0600
Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-11 00:18 +0000
Re: Current profile dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> - 2021-04-11 02:26 +0200
Re: Current profile Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2021-04-11 07:05 +0100
Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-11 09:40 +0100
Re: Current profile WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-11 09:23 -0400
Re: Current profile Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2021-04-11 15:17 +0100
Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-11 15:38 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-14 15:59 +0200
Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-14 19:26 +0200
Re: Current profile [OT] Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-04-14 13:52 -0700
Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-14 16:59 -0400
Re: Current profile [OT] Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-14 21:32 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-15 21:48 +0200
Re: Current profile [OT] Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2021-04-16 07:21 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-17 15:55 +0200
Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-17 10:17 -0400
Re: Current profile [OT] Ken Whiton <kenwhiton@surfglobal.net.INVAL> - 2021-04-15 23:17 -0400
Re: Current profile [OT] Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-04-14 15:10 -0600
Re: Current profile [OT] Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-14 22:00 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-14 18:21 -0400
Re: Current profile [OT] "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-14 23:41 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-14 20:39 -0400
Re: Current profile [OT] "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-15 01:25 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2021-04-14 17:44 -0700
Re: Current profile [OT] Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-04-14 16:25 -0700
Re: Current profile [OT] Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-04-14 18:00 -0600
Re: Current profile [OT] "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-15 00:27 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-15 06:48 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-15 16:14 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-15 09:44 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-15 09:53 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-15 12:19 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-15 08:04 -0400
Re: Current profile [OT] "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-15 13:01 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-15 13:59 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2021-04-15 23:32 +0000
Re: Current profile [OT] Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-04-15 16:39 -0700
Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-15 21:44 +0200
Re: Current profile Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2021-04-15 08:11 +0000
Re: Current profile Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-04-11 11:30 -0600
Re: Current profile "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-14 16:04 +0200
Re: Current profile Ken Whiton <kenwhiton@surfglobal.net.INVAL> - 2021-04-15 15:26 -0400
Re: Current profile Sailfish <sailfish@unforgettable.com> - 2021-04-11 19:14 -0700
Re: Current profile Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2021-04-12 07:34 +0100
Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-12 10:38 +0100
Re: Current profile Jeff Layman <jmlayman@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-12 15:08 +0100
Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-12 15:49 +0100
Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-12 17:29 +0000
Re: Current profile Jeff Layman <jmlayman@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-12 22:06 +0100
Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-12 21:28 +0000
Re: Current profile Mint User <mint@aio3.org> - 2021-04-12 22:48 +0100
Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-12 23:12 +0000
Re: Current profile WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-12 18:28 -0400
Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-13 12:05 +0000
Re: Current profile Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-13 07:25 +0100
Re: Current profile Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-13 06:29 +0000
Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-13 08:38 +0100
Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-14 16:04 +0200
csiph-web