Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.unix.programmer > #281
| From | Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Makefile portability |
| Date | 2011-04-30 18:03 +0100 |
| Message-Id | <pan.2011.04.30.17.03.22.860000@nowhere.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.unix.programmer |
| References | <dd51ecd2-2a42-4338-bc3b-eb2adefe1924@r6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <4db9c0f9$0$11427$a729d347@news.telepac.pt> |
| Organization | Zen Internet |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:33:16 +0100, Rui Maciel wrote: > Therefore, if someone feels the need to handle "portable makefiles" then, > instead of reinventing makefiles and utilities that mangle them, that > person only needs to do the job properly, which is to simply install a > standard shell on their system. Just because something is "standard", that doesn't mean that it's a good idea. On Windows, using a Unix shell is usually a particularly bad idea, one of the main reasons for which is that the Unix shell treats the Windows directory separator character (backslash) as an escape character. Even on Unix, using a Unix shell isn't a great idea, as the language itself has been compromised, for the sake of interactive use, for simplicity, and for compatibility with previous versions. Languages which rely upon textual substition make it easy to write code which works 98% of the time but often much harder to write code which works all the time. Whichever shell you use, you run into the issue that even primitive operations rely upon external commands, each with their own quirks.
Back to comp.unix.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Makefile portability tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-04-25 04:54 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Leclerc <gordan.sikic.remove@this.inet.hr> - 2011-04-26 08:51 +0200
Re: Makefile portability tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-04-26 04:25 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-04-26 16:18 +0100
Re: Makefile portability William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2011-04-26 11:19 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> - 2011-04-27 18:53 +0100
Re: Makefile portability "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2011-04-27 14:14 -0800
Re: Makefile portability tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-04-30 01:07 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> - 2011-04-30 13:45 +0100
Re: Makefile portability Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> - 2011-04-30 13:14 +0100
Re: Makefile portability tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-04-28 00:02 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 20:43 +0100
Re: Makefile portability tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-04-28 13:57 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 11:18 +0100
Re: Makefile portability Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> - 2011-04-29 20:43 +0100
Re: Makefile portability Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-04-30 11:38 +0100
Re: Makefile portability and file utility programs Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> - 2011-04-29 20:27 +0100
Re: Makefile portability tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-04-29 15:26 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2011-04-29 23:45 +0100
Re: Makefile portability Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-04-30 11:26 +0100
Re: Makefile portability Leclerc <gordan.sikic.remove@this.inet.hr> - 2011-04-27 09:28 +0200
Re: Makefile portability Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 11:28 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-04-26 21:41 +0100
Re: Makefile portability tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-04-26 23:17 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-04-27 14:08 +0100
Re: Makefile portability Leo Havmøller <rtxleh@nospam.nospam> - 2011-04-27 13:15 +0200
Re: Makefile portability tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-04-27 05:50 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 20:36 +0100
Re: Makefile portability tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-04-28 14:12 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 11:03 +0100
Re: Makefile portability tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-04-29 09:30 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 15:08 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 15:17 -0700
Re: Makefile dependency graphs gordonb.d36yw@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-04-30 02:02 -0500
Re: Makefile dependency graphs Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-04-30 00:36 -0700
Re: Makefile dependency graphs Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-04-30 01:13 -0700
Re: Makefile dependency graphs William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2011-04-30 11:30 -0700
Re: Makefile dependency graphs Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-04-30 15:44 -0700
Re: Makefile dependency graphs Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-05-03 11:48 -0700
Re: Makefile dependency graphs Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> - 2011-04-30 12:59 +0100
Re: Makefile dependency graphs Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> - 2011-04-29 02:55 +0100
Re: Makefile dependency graphs William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2011-04-28 19:52 -0700
Re: Makefile dependency graphs Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 02:10 -0700
Re: Makefile dependency graphs Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2011-04-29 20:59 +0100
Re: Makefile dependency graphs Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 15:21 -0700
Re: Makefile dependency graphs Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.COM> - 2011-04-29 20:08 +0100
Re: Makefile dependency graphs Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 15:08 -0700
Re: Makefile dependency graphs Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 16:11 -0700
Re: Makefile dependency graphs William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2011-04-29 16:03 -0700
Re: Makefile dependency graphs Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 16:48 -0700
Re: Makefile dependency graphs Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 16:54 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 20:33 +0100
Re: Makefile portability tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-04-28 14:20 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-04-30 18:03 +0100
Re: Makefile portability William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2011-04-30 12:01 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-05-01 12:33 +0100
Re: Makefile portability Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-05-02 03:44 +0100
Re: Makefile portability William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2011-05-01 21:27 -0700
Re: Makefile portability tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-05-02 00:11 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2011-05-02 13:41 +0100
Re: Makefile portability Freedom on the Oceans <alex.buell@munted.org.uk> - 2011-05-02 14:36 +0100
Re: Makefile portability tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-05-02 08:09 -0700
Re: Makefile portability Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-05-02 23:49 +0100
Re: Makefile portability Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2011-05-03 10:41 +0100
Re: Makefile portability Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-05-05 08:30 +0100
csiph-web