Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #412684

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

From "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.
Date 2017-05-03 14:35 +0100
Organization ~
Message-ID <op.yznz002djs98qf@red.lan> (permalink)
References (15 earlier) <D52146FB.A0DF2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <odgtk8$dfh$1@dont-email.me> <D521493E.A0E00%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <odgu2f$dfh$2@dont-email.me> <D5214DCD.A0E16%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 02:13:33 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

> On 4/22/17, 5:55 PM, in article odgu2f$dfh$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 17:54:06 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>> On 4/22/17, 5:48 PM, in article odgtk8$dfh$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>>>>> OK, so you have nothing to counter it with. Fair enough.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't need to counter it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Correct: but if you are going to deny it you should back your denial with
>>>>> something. Or you can say you just disagree and offer nothing relevant.
>>>>
>>>> I don't deny someone wrote a book (maybe to get into the "rich" class).
>>>
>>> You disagree with a researched perspective you cannot counter. That is fine.
>>
>> I'm not ordering that book, no matter how many times you suggest it.
>
> Which so far is zero. But OK.
>
> Are you planning on disordering that book? Maybe place it in the section on
> penguins?

Disordering the book would mean swapping the pages about.  He'll get a library fine for that:
http://i4.ytimg.com/vi/poBqXBjxqIc/hqdefault.jpg

>>>>>> The US has rich people of all races, religions, national origins.
>>>>>
>>>>> Like that: not relevant. Nobody said, suggested, hinted, or implied
>>>>> otherwise.
>>>>
>>>> My bad.
>>>> The US has poor people of all races, religions, national origins.
>>>
>>> That is also true... and also something that nobody said, suggested, hinted,
>>> or implied was not true.
>>
>> Then what's the fuckin book about?
>> You linked to it.
>
> Ah, you disagree with an idea but have NO understanding of it. Let me guess:
> you support Trump.

Trump will be the saviour of the USA.  He has common sense and ignores silly snowflakes like yourself.

>>>>>>>>>> Is it in the cereal isle near the froot loops?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nope... that is where environmental disasters are. :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The froot loops come after them. :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes... they are listed alphabetically.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The froot loops always follow anything environmental.
>>>>>> Froot loops are big into race issues too.
>>>>>> You would think people may be tempted to make careers out of it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not surprised to see you thinking in such terms.
>>>>
>>>> I'm consistant.
>>>
>>> You are better than a Linux distro! :)
>>
>> So my Mom used to say.
>
> Moms are like that.

It's "mum".  Think how you pronounce "mother".

-- 
Dopeler effect (n): The tendency of stupid ideas to seem smarter when they come at you rapidly.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 14:35 +0100

csiph-web