Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #410685
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. |
| Date | 2017-04-22 18:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5214DCD.A0E16%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (21 earlier) <odgscl$a81$2@dont-email.me> <D52146FB.A0DF2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <odgtk8$dfh$1@dont-email.me> <D521493E.A0E00%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <odgu2f$dfh$2@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On 4/22/17, 5:55 PM, in article odgu2f$dfh$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 17:54:06 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/22/17, 5:48 PM, in article odgtk8$dfh$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>>> OK, so you have nothing to counter it with. Fair enough. >>>>> >>>>> I don't need to counter it. >>>> >>>> Correct: but if you are going to deny it you should back your denial with >>>> something. Or you can say you just disagree and offer nothing relevant. >>> >>> I don't deny someone wrote a book (maybe to get into the "rich" class). >> >> You disagree with a researched perspective you cannot counter. That is fine. > > I'm not ordering that book, no matter how many times you suggest it. Which so far is zero. But OK. Are you planning on disordering that book? Maybe place it in the section on penguins? >>>>> The US has rich people of all races, religions, national origins. >>>> >>>> Like that: not relevant. Nobody said, suggested, hinted, or implied >>>> otherwise. >>> >>> My bad. >>> The US has poor people of all races, religions, national origins. >> >> That is also true... and also something that nobody said, suggested, hinted, >> or implied was not true. > > Then what's the fuckin book about? > You linked to it. Ah, you disagree with an idea but have NO understanding of it. Let me guess: you support Trump. >>>>>>>>> Is it in the cereal isle near the froot loops? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope... that is where environmental disasters are. :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The froot loops come after them. :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes... they are listed alphabetically. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The froot loops always follow anything environmental. >>>>> Froot loops are big into race issues too. >>>>> You would think people may be tempted to make careers out of it. >>>> >>>> I am not surprised to see you thinking in such terms. >>> >>> I'm consistant. >> >> You are better than a Linux distro! :) > > So my Mom used to say. Moms are like that. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 22:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 15:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-22 22:58 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 16:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:01 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 18:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 01:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-23 08:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 15:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 10:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-23 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 00:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:16 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:22 -0700
csiph-web