Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole?

From	SeaNymph <SeaNymph@deepbluesea.com>
Newsgroups	alt.computer.workshop, alt.computer.workshop.live, alt.politics.scorched-earth
Subject	Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole?
Date	2016-05-05 15:37 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<ngganm$ijo$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <20160505080502.00004d60@buf.uk> <ngfijt$j02$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me> <ngfkia$qco$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me> <ngfqb8$1da$1@n102.xanadu-bbs.net> <ngftmd$stk$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/5/2016 11:54 AM, David B. wrote:
> On 05/05/2016 16:54, Felix Kaat wrote:
>> David B., the cross-posting, nym-shifting stalker wrote:
>>
>>> David B. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Question submitted to Ask Bob Rankin on Thursday, May 5, 2016
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bob I've found 'hidden links' in the HTML of this web site:-
>>>>
>>>> Why is it there? Why *does* this code languish on the
>>>> <snip> site?
>>
>> *Stalker!* How many times do you need to be told it's nothing
>> more than advertising on a stale web site?
>
> It should NOT be there!
>

Do you own that particular domain name?  Is it your website?  If not, 
you have nothing to say about what is there and what isn't.  Besides, 
you're just an idiotic stalker.

Back to alt.computer.workshop.live | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-05-05 14:45 +0100
  Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-05-05 15:19 +0100
    Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? Felix Kaat <nobody@nowhere.inv> - 2016-05-05 11:54 -0400
      Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-05-05 17:54 +0100
        Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? Felix Kaat <nobody@nowhere.inv> - 2016-05-05 13:19 -0400
        Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-05-05 17:32 +0000
          Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-05-05 15:30 -0400
        Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? SeaNymph <SeaNymph@deepbluesea.com> - 2016-05-05 15:37 -0500
          Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-05-05 16:41 -0400
  Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-05-05 15:29 -0400

csiph-web