Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole?

From	burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk>
Newsgroups	alt.computer.workshop, alt.computer.workshop.live, alt.politics.scorched-earth
Subject	Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole?
Date	2016-05-05 16:41 -0400
Organization	Devon-Local
Message-ID	<20160505164121.000003e7@buf.uk> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <ngfijt$j02$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me> <ngfkia$qco$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me> <ngfqb8$1da$1@n102.xanadu-bbs.net> <ngftmd$stk$1@boaterdave.dont-email.me> <ngganm$ijo$2@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 5 May 2016 15:37:25 -0500
SeaNymph <SeaNymph@deepbluesea.com> wrote:

> On 5/5/2016 11:54 AM, David B. wrote:
> > On 05/05/2016 16:54, Felix Kaat wrote:
> >> David B., the cross-posting, nym-shifting stalker wrote:
> >>
> >>> David B. wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Question submitted to Ask Bob Rankin on Thursday, May 5, 2016
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Bob I've found 'hidden links' in the HTML of this web site:-
> >>>>
> >>>> Why is it there? Why *does* this code languish on the
> >>>> <snip> site?
> >>
> >> *Stalker!* How many times do you need to be told it's nothing
> >> more than advertising on a stale web site?
> >
> > It should NOT be there!
> >
> 
> Do you own that particular domain name?  Is it your website?  If not, 
> you have nothing to say about what is there and what isn't.  Besides, 
> you're just an idiotic stalker.
> 
> 

Drunk idiotic stalker

Back to alt.computer.workshop.live | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-05-05 14:45 +0100
  Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-05-05 15:19 +0100
    Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? Felix Kaat <nobody@nowhere.inv> - 2016-05-05 11:54 -0400
      Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? "David B." <echolot@pinger.invalid> - 2016-05-05 17:54 +0100
        Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? Felix Kaat <nobody@nowhere.inv> - 2016-05-05 13:19 -0400
        Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-05-05 17:32 +0000
          Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-05-05 15:30 -0400
        Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? SeaNymph <SeaNymph@deepbluesea.com> - 2016-05-05 15:37 -0500
          Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-05-05 16:41 -0400
  Re: Is your website or blog at risk from this ImageMagick security hole? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buf.uk> - 2016-05-05 15:29 -0400

csiph-web