Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register

Groups > chi.internet > #3349

Re: Spam

Show all headers | View raw

Crawford Sausage Company <mea@brandylion.com> wrote:

> Interesting.  I could see this possibly be useful for a TV commercial
> say instead of match.com they could advertise it as match.date.  T
> hat has problems because .com has been synonymous with root for
> as long as there has been a web.  If a commercial has to inform you
> that match.dat is a valid url it may defeat these new TLD's entire 
> purpose, simplicity  Even .org and .net don't get used much.

It's been tried...

http://domainnamewire.com/2015/02/03/see-buzz-domain-name-on-wheel-of-fortune/

My problem is I never considered a domain name as the guide to what is
underneath the surface. I mean a long time ago when this shit all started,
if you wanted to put up a website/blog about playing poker, getting the
domain name of poker.com, playingpoker.com or similar, you did have a leg up
on being found.

These days, it just doesn't work that way. Even here, last week when you put
up the post about the gyros at that Georges place, never heard of it and
wanted to see what they had.

You mentioned Cortland and Damen, pulled that up on the Maps program, a
building with "Georges Hot Dogs" and an "I" (for info) was there, click/tap
that, showed the full name, address and phone along with a yelp link. Click
on the link, yelp shows the reveiws, some pictures and the URL of the place.
One more click, there you are on their website.

The domain name didn't have anything to do with it. He could be using
deathbyslowpoison.com or ourketchupreallysucks.com, but it wouldn't of made
any difference to me with the way I tracked them down.

And that's my point, if we decided to start registering .hotdogs as a top
level domain, is that really going to help anything with him and his
business. I mean him having http://georges.hotdogs for his website is a
novelty item, but that's about it.

> To companies like Apple it would be loose change in the couch to
> purchase .apple, or ibm purchasing .ibm.  There may be value in
> that since those corporations can divvy out domains to partners
> and when those partners stop being partners they can take them
> away because they own the entire namespace.  So if you went to
> say newegg.apple it would present a page that lists all the top
> deals at newegg for apple products.  That could be useful.

Yeah if doing that becomes "a thing". I just don't see it. If I wanted to
get a new iPod or iPad, I'd probably start with a search for "iXxx on sale"
or something and not sit here typing in sears.apple, walmart.apple,
costco.apple and what other vendors (even if I knew all of them) to see what
they had.

Even if apple listed them on a page to go through, the url of where you are
going to is irrelevant. They can do that now going the other way around,

sears.apple.com
costco.apple.com
walmart.apple.com

or they mix it up the other way, sears can do a apple.sears.com and costco
can do apple.costco.com. It doesn't help because it's not "a thing".

At one time, when people used to sit around typing in random domain names to
see what was there, fine. But these days with google, bing, yahoo,
duckduckgo and hundreds of other search engines, again I just don't see
where (or how clever) the domain name is, that it's going to make a
difference.

Just now for yucks I typed in

bestgyrosinchicago.com

and there is nothing there, no server/host, checked whois, no such domain
name is registered.

Why not? For the $12 or so you can own it, but is it worth anything to
anyone?

Now in the search box, type in "best gyros in chicago" and what comes back?

chicagoist.com
cbslocal.com
thrillist.com
chicago.eater.com
yelp.com
tripadvisor.com

The first hit that isn't a review site is on page 2, "Jesters Fast Food
Restaurants". They aren't even in fucking Chicago.

All this boils down to is the domain name, what top level it's under just
doesn't make a difference in the real world. It's a vanity thing and nothing
else.

True story:

Back when Ripco was just starting out and we were ordering the hardware and
trying to figure out things (no inet connection, just talk), the domain name
to call it came up for discussion. Naturally I didn't see anything else to
call it except ripco.com.

Nope, the other guys that were there just didn't think it was a good idea,
people would think it meant rip off company, if they used the email for
business it would be embarassing. So they talked me out of it.

Back then domain names, besides being free were registered by email to the
internic, usually handled by the upstream provider, in our case it was uunet
technologies.

So we filed for rci.com

Couple weeks later (yes it used to take weeks, sometimes months to get a
domain name), I was in the office by myself when uunet calls. The guy on the
phone says the application for rci.com got turned down because it was
already registered and "in use". He wanted to know if we had an alternate.

My kneejerk response was going to be "we'll call you back" because it needed
to have "a meeting" to figure it out but then I'm thinking, what the fuck
does it really matter, it's not what you call it but how reliable the
service and performance is going to be, so I told him to file for ripco.com.

If there was someone out there not wanting to do business with us because of
the name, fuck them, I wouldn't want to do business with them for that
reason.

So here it is, like 22 or 23 years later and pretty much the last man
standing. If we would of done better with rci.com, I don't see where and
how.

-bruce
bje@ripco.com

Back to chi.internet | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Spam Crawford Sausage Company <mea@brandylion.com> - 2016-01-31 13:01 -0800
  Re: Spam Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2016-02-02 14:00 +0000
    Re: Spam Max <betatron@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 18:15 -0600
    Re: Spam Michele <eatshitanddie@spammers.com> - 2016-02-04 15:11 -0600
      Re: Spam Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2016-02-05 12:24 +0000
        Re: Spam Michele <eatshitanddie@spammers.com> - 2016-02-05 12:40 -0600
          Re: Spam core <core@pt40.net> - 2016-02-05 19:52 -0600
            Re: Spam Michele <eatshitanddie@spammers.com> - 2016-02-06 01:02 -0600
    Re: Spam Crawford Sausage Company <mea@brandylion.com> - 2016-02-04 16:03 -0800
      Re: Spam Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2016-02-05 12:09 +0000
        Re: Spam Crawford Sausage Company <mea@brandylion.com> - 2016-02-06 11:11 -0800
          Re: Spam Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2016-02-07 12:58 +0000
            Re: Spam Michele <eatshitanddie@spammers.com> - 2016-02-08 02:58 -0600
              Re: Spam Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2016-02-08 18:55 +0000
                Re: Spam Michele <eatshitanddie@spammers.com> - 2016-02-08 22:15 -0600
                Re: Spam Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2016-02-09 14:10 +0000
                Re: Spam Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2016-02-09 19:26 +0000
                Re: Spam barbie gee <booger@nosespam.com> - 2016-02-09 15:45 -0600
                Re: Spam Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2016-02-09 22:20 +0000
            Re: Spam Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2016-02-08 18:48 +0000
              Re: Spam Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2016-02-09 14:52 +0000
                Re: Spam Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2016-02-09 19:50 +0000
                Re: Spam Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2016-02-10 12:51 +0000
            Re: Spam Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com> - 2016-02-13 17:16 +0000
              Re: Spam Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2016-02-14 13:29 +0000
                Re: Spam Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2016-02-14 14:09 +0000
                Re: Spam Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2016-02-15 17:08 +0000
                Re: Spam Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2016-02-16 12:57 +0000
                Re: Spam Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2016-02-16 16:30 +0000
                Re: Spam smr <me@shawnritchie.com> - 2016-02-16 17:54 -0600
                Re: Spam Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2016-02-17 12:44 +0000
                Re: Spam smr <me@shawnritchie.com> - 2016-02-17 11:57 -0600
                Re: Spam Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2016-02-17 18:15 +0000
                Re: Spam Michele <eatshitanddie@spammers.com> - 2016-02-16 11:13 -0600
                Re: Spam Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2016-02-17 13:39 +0000
                Re: Spam Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2016-02-17 18:20 +0000
                Re: Spam Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2016-02-17 18:29 +0000
                Re: Spam smr <me@shawnritchie.com> - 2016-02-17 17:43 -0600
            Re: Spam Crawford Sausage Company <mea@brandylion.com> - 2016-10-18 12:34 -0700
              Re: Spam Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2016-10-19 11:26 +0000
                Re: Spam Crawford Sausage Company <mea@brandylion.com> - 2016-10-19 09:51 -0700
            Re: Spam tert in seattle <tert@ftupet.com> - 2016-11-14 22:50 +0000

csiph-web