Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ?

From	"Max" <max@val.morgan>
Newsgroups	aus.computers
Subject	Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ?
Date	2015-12-07 19:29 +0800
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<n43qji$3mf$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<n43e1c$72u$1@speranza.aioe.org> <n43e13$nhb$1@dont-email.me> <n43mvl$r3f$1@speranza.aioe.org> <n43nb0$nep$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

"Xeno" <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message 
news:n43nb0$nep$1@dont-email.me...
> On 7/12/2015 9:28 PM, Max wrote:
>>
>> "Xeno" <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:n43e13$nhb$1@dont-email.me...
>>> On 7/12/2015 6:55 PM, Max wrote:
>>>> If a WIFI modem has both 2.5 and 5 GHZ networks, which one should be
>>>> used for normal home use?
>>>
>>> 2.4 GHz if you need distance, 5 GHz if your 2.4 spectrum is crowded.
>>> Both if you crave speed!
>>>
>>
>> Windows only lets you connect to one wireless network at a time.
>
>
> You might want to read up the latest tech then.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/6p4yfkn
>

I understand that the router is broadcasting both networks at once, but each 
device can only connect to one at a time.

So when you say "both if you crave speed", what do you mean?

Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

2.4 or 5 GHz ? "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-12-07 15:55 +0800
  Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-07 18:57 +1100
    Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-12-07 18:28 +0800
      Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-07 21:36 +1100
        Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-12-07 19:29 +0800
          Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-07 22:35 +1100
          Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 07:32 +1100
      Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 06:46 +1100
  Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 19:57 +1100

csiph-web