Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > aus.computers > #49251

Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ?

From "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups aus.computers
Subject Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ?
Date 2015-12-09 06:46 +1100
Message-ID <dcoqbsF9ag0U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <n43e1c$72u$1@speranza.aioe.org> <n43e13$nhb$1@dont-email.me> <n43mvl$r3f$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Max <max@val.morgan> wrote 
> Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote 
>> Max wrote

>>> If a WIFI modem has both 2.5 and 5 GHZ networks, 
>>> which one should be used for normal home use?

>> 2.4 GHz if you need distance, 5 GHz if your 2.4 
>> spectrum is crowded. Both if you crave speed!

> Windows only lets you connect to one wireless network at a time. 

But that one network can support both frequencys simultaneously
and so can be used by devices that have just 2.5G and 5G support. 

And by devices that support both too.  

Back to aus.computers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

2.4 or 5 GHz ? "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-12-07 15:55 +0800
  Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-07 18:57 +1100
    Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-12-07 18:28 +0800
      Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-07 21:36 +1100
        Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-12-07 19:29 +0800
          Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-07 22:35 +1100
          Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 07:32 +1100
      Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 06:46 +1100
  Re: 2.4 or 5 GHz ? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 19:57 +1100

csiph-web