Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #44210
| From | Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: List Count |
| Date | 2013-04-23 16:00 -0400 |
| References | (2 earlier) <517545F7.5090209@nowhere.org> <5175c12f$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <e4KdnXzMesF-r-vMnZ2dnUVZ8rWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <51769f96$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <fd6dnXTDxbbiIOvMnZ2dnUVZ8qGdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.990.1366747255.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 4/23/2013 12:57 PM, Blind Anagram wrote: > So, all I was doing in asking for advice was to check whether there is > an easy way of avoiding the slice copy, And there is. > not because this is critical, > but rather because it is a pity to limit the performance because Python > forces a (strictly unnecessary) copy in order to perform a count within > a part of a list. Python does not force that. You have been given several simple no-copy alternatives. They happen to be slower *with CPython* because of the speed difference between Python code and C code. If the same timing tests were done with any of the implementations that execute python code faster, the results would likely be different. I thing str/byte/bytearray.count have more need for optional start,stop boundary parameters because a) people search in long texts and subtexts, more so I think that for other sequences, b) they search for substrings longer than 1 and hence c) the generic no-slice alternatives do not work for counting substrings. That said, I do see that tuple/list.index have had start, stop paramaters added, so doing the same for .count is conceivable. I just do not remember anyone else asking for such. The use case must be very rare. And as I said in my other post, .count(x) applies to any collections, but start,stop would only apply to sequences. > In other words, the lack of a list.count(value, limit) function makes > Python less effective than it would otherwise be. Untrue. The alternatives are just as *effective*.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-22 12:58 +0100
Re: List Count Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-04-22 08:51 -0400
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-22 14:03 +0100
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-22 14:03 +0100
Re: List Count Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-22 13:13 +0000
Re: List Count Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2013-04-22 08:57 -0500
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-22 15:15 +0100
Re: List Count Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-22 16:14 +0100
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-22 16:50 +0100
Re: List Count Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-22 17:06 +0100
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-22 17:38 +0100
Re: List Count Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2013-04-22 12:48 -0500
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-22 20:22 +0100
Re: List Count Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-22 21:18 +0100
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-22 22:25 +0100
Re: List Count Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 00:06 +0100
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-23 07:45 +0100
Re: List Count Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-22 23:28 +0000
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-23 08:00 +0100
Re: List Count Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-22 22:03 +0100
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-22 22:32 +0100
Re: List Count Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-04-22 21:47 -0400
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-23 08:02 +0100
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-22 17:38 +0100
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-22 16:50 +0100
Re: List Count Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-22 23:01 +0000
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-23 08:05 +0100
Re: List Count Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 12:08 +0100
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-23 12:45 +0100
Re: List Count Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-04-23 15:01 -0400
Re: List Count Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-23 14:49 +0000
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-23 17:57 +0100
Re: List Count Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 18:45 +0100
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-23 19:30 +0100
Re: List Count Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 20:16 +0100
Re: List Count Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-04-23 16:00 -0400
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-23 21:41 +0100
Re: List Count Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 21:38 +0100
Re: List Count Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-24 01:59 +0000
Re: List Count Blind Anagram <blindanagram@nowhere.org> - 2013-04-24 10:01 +0100
Re: List Count Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-04-22 15:22 +0200
Re: List Count 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-04-22 06:36 -0700
csiph-web