Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #9379
| Subject | Re: Code hosting services |
|---|---|
| From | Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> |
| Date | 2011-07-13 06:23 -0400 |
| References | <4E1D413E.7080002@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.966.1310552783.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 01:54 -0500, Andrew Berg wrote: > I know this isn't specific to Python, but it is somewhat on topic. Way > back when I had a simple project, SourceForge was by far the most > prominent place to host (and it still is, though to a lesser extent > now). SourceForge is still an option for me, but I know there are many > other hosts out there. The problem is I don't which one what the pros > and cons of each are. Wikipedia has some information, but it's generally > objective. This is useful, but it's not enough to narrow my choices down > to one or two. What can you guys recommend? SourceForge; it is a comprehensive platform [in addition to being an Open Source platform: Allura]. It is a much improved platform over several years ago. > BTW, I'll likely be sticking with Mercurial for revision control. > TortoiseHg is a wonderful tool set and I managed to get MercurialEclipse > working well. I use Hg on SF, it works very well.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Code hosting services Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> - 2011-07-13 06:23 -0400
csiph-web