Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #9379 > unrolled thread

Re: Code hosting services

Started byAdam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org>
First post2011-07-13 06:23 -0400
Last post2011-07-13 06:23 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Code hosting services Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> - 2011-07-13 06:23 -0400

#9379 — Re: Code hosting services

FromAdam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org>
Date2011-07-13 06:23 -0400
SubjectRe: Code hosting services
Message-ID<mailman.966.1310552783.1164.python-list@python.org>
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 01:54 -0500, Andrew Berg wrote:
> I know this isn't specific to Python, but it is somewhat on topic. Way
> back when I had a simple project, SourceForge was by far the most
> prominent place to host (and it still is, though to a lesser extent
> now). SourceForge is still an option for me, but I know there are many
> other hosts out there. The problem is I don't which one what the pros
> and cons of each are. Wikipedia has some information, but it's generally
> objective. This is useful, but it's not enough to narrow my choices down
> to one or two. What can you guys recommend?

SourceForge;  it is a comprehensive platform [in addition to being an
Open Source platform: Allura].  It is a much improved platform over
several years ago.

> BTW, I'll likely be sticking with Mercurial for revision control.
> TortoiseHg is a wonderful tool set and I managed to get MercurialEclipse
> working well.

I use Hg on SF, it works very well.


[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web