Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #70569
| References | <80a82415-fc67-4ccf-8827-27a0ba5459b7@googlegroups.com> <mailman.9472.1398294517.18130.python-list@python.org> <6bf23ea5-e534-486e-adc9-675fe97fa414@googlegroups.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-04-24 17:36 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.9480.1398324998.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:21 PM, <tim.thelion@gmail.com> wrote: >> [snip] >> >> Could you make the program name unique just by combining it with the >> >> repository name in a single string? > > In my case I cannot. But there is a larger reason why I wouldn't do this: It would mean adding a special character that could not be included in the repository name, that is, if I were to create a "unique-program-name" string which was of the format repo+"-"+programName then the repo name could not have the "-" symbol in it. > Can you, then, simply substitute a tuple for the string? Instead of comparing program name strings, compare tuples of (repo, program_name) - it should work just fine. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one tim.thelion@gmail.com - 2014-04-23 13:57 -0700
Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-04-23 22:15 +0100
Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-04-23 15:23 -0600
Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-24 12:26 +1200
Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-04-23 14:42 -0700
Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one tim.thelion@gmail.com - 2014-04-24 00:32 -0700
Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-04-24 00:08 +0100
Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one tim.thelion@gmail.com - 2014-04-24 00:21 -0700
Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-24 17:36 +1000
Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-24 09:08 +0000
Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-24 09:12 +1000
Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-24 12:21 +1200
Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one tim.thelion@gmail.com - 2014-04-24 09:53 -0700
Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche.boubekki@gmail.com> - 2014-04-25 19:21 +0200
Re:Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-04-23 22:01 -0400
csiph-web