Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.014
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.97; 'S': 0.00; 'repository': 0.05; 'string': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; "wouldn't": 0.14; '"-"': 0.16; '24,': 0.16; 'fine.': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'subject:OOP': 0.16; 'substitute': 0.16; 'tuple': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'comparing': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'compare': 0.26; 'this:': 0.26; 'skip:" 20': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'character': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'included': 0.31; 'tuples': 0.31; 'subject:from': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'subject:one': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.38; 'then,': 0.60; 'simply': 0.61; 'name': 0.63; 'combining': 0.68; 'special': 0.74; 'subject:Moving': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4NET+qM9E+mA+6yBjEVTQ80b1Y66kyguOlIh4unxCTU=; b=B/n4Azma/hEN3A+pPfei+di6rDw4gVU4niE3F2vbPZjiV3T/Boj8F8XFWBcgmB7/6E s7qv5nDfPoV1l04505ORTJQBa5rY3OqtvBU2W4OB6Z1Am4j3svp+8v0lid5zdcktHxbI yXQoQXZ/4ElIi7eUKMxXZ8dbz59XVoXl6yfgpZ/apDz5199pW6H3mFLXkiErFLqn2N+h jNZBwc0Dff7aZF7TEESMYZu8HQb9ePphhJ4tHUSL6NZXrLrhQalyXrJ6TIpMih5prhT/ 4e/hhEsdZWFZPu3pl7xKt+zsGefpZJTnA0eR8MOEeL11SRVjrnOsecyjyxvRTYXNxTqy uIhw==
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Received	by 10.52.160.98 with SMTP id xj2mr87425vdb.80.1398324989647; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To	<6bf23ea5-e534-486e-adc9-675fe97fa414@googlegroups.com>
References	<80a82415-fc67-4ccf-8827-27a0ba5459b7@googlegroups.com> <mailman.9472.1398294517.18130.python-list@python.org> <6bf23ea5-e534-486e-adc9-675fe97fa414@googlegroups.com>
Date	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 17:36:29 +1000
Subject	Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Cc	"python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.9480.1398324998.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	19
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1398324998 news.xs4all.nl 2892 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59397
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:70569

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:21 PM,  <tim.thelion@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> Could you make the program name unique just by combining it with the
>>
>> repository name in a single string?
>
> In my case I cannot.  But there is a larger reason why I wouldn't do this:  It would mean adding a special character that could not be included in the repository name, that is, if I were to create a "unique-program-name" string which was of the format repo+"-"+programName then the repo name could not have the "-" symbol in it.
>

Can you, then, simply substitute a tuple for the string? Instead of
comparing program name strings, compare tuples of (repo, program_name)
- it should work just fine.

ChrisA

Thread

Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one tim.thelion@gmail.com - 2014-04-23 13:57 -0700
  Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-04-23 22:15 +0100
  Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-04-23 15:23 -0600
    Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-24 12:26 +1200
  Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-04-23 14:42 -0700
    Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one tim.thelion@gmail.com - 2014-04-24 00:32 -0700
  Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-04-24 00:08 +0100
    Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one tim.thelion@gmail.com - 2014-04-24 00:21 -0700
      Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-24 17:36 +1000
      Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-24 09:08 +0000
  Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-24 09:12 +1000
  Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-24 12:21 +1200
    Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one tim.thelion@gmail.com - 2014-04-24 09:53 -0700
      Re: Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche.boubekki@gmail.com> - 2014-04-25 19:21 +0200
  Re:Moving to an OOP model from an classically imperitive one Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-04-23 22:01 -0400

csiph-web