Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #36123
| References | <kc541v$3e4$1@reader1.panix.com> <50e6891c$0$30003$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <kc70hb$p5$1@reader1.panix.com> <mailman.89.1357318292.2939.python-list@python.org> <kc72ls$3m7$1@reader1.panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-05 04:21 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.91.1357320101.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 2013-01-04, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >>> I've added equals, backslash, commas, square/curly brackets, colons >>> and semicolons to the prohibited character list. I also reduced the >>> maximum length to 60 characters. It's unfortunate that parentheses >>> are overloaded for both expression grouping and for function >>> calling... >> >> I have to say that an expression evaluator that can't handle parens >> for grouping is badly flawed. > > Indeed. That's why I didn't disallow parens. > > What I was implying was that since you have to allow parens for > grouping, there's no simple way to disallow function calls. Yeah, and a safe evaluator that allows function calls is highly vulnerable. >> Can you demand that open parenthesis be preceded by an operator (or >> beginning of line)? > > Yes, but once you've parsed the expression to the point where you can > enforce rules like that, you're probably most of the way to doing the > "right" thing and evaluating the expression using ast or pyparsing or > similar. > > Some might argue that repeated tweaking of and adding limitiations to > a "safe eval" is just heading down that same road in a different car. > They'd probably be right: in the end, it will probably have been less > work to just do it with ast. But it's still interesting to try. :) Yep, have fun with it. As mentioned earlier, though, security isn't all that critical; so in this case, chances are you can just leave parens permitted and let function calls potentially happen. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-03 23:25 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-01-03 19:11 -0600
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 02:34 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-01-04 07:47 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 15:53 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-01-04 09:05 -0700
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 16:16 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-01-05 15:56 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-06 15:12 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-01-07 00:08 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 03:01 +1100
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-01-05 16:17 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call matt.newville@gmail.com - 2013-01-05 08:40 -0800
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call matt.newville@gmail.com - 2013-01-05 08:40 -0800
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 16:38 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-05 03:51 +1100
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 17:14 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-05 04:21 +1100
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 18:09 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-05 05:23 +1100
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 18:43 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-05 06:02 +1100
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2013-01-03 23:50 -0800
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-01-04 07:24 -0500
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-01-04 13:33 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 15:59 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2013-01-04 18:13 +0000
csiph-web