Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #68663
| References | <CAPTjJmq4MkGjOY_en-v=hA=3oJ1sef_uF8BbQ9nm6r8nPMwTgA@mail.gmail.com> <20140321013313.GA58343@cskk.homeip.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-21 13:14 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Question about Source Control |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.8339.1395368070.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote: > Regarding having Mercurial installed, that is very easy, and after > you've gone (eg): > > hg clone https://bitbucket.org/cameron_simpson/css my-copy-of-cameron's-css > > (or wherever the public repository is published), you can of course > then walk away and work. You no longer need the public copy at all. > > With a DVCS the threshold is low and the advantages are high (hg > or git; I'm an hg person myself). Yes, it's not hard to get Mercurial. And it's not hard to get git. But it is an extra barrier, and trying to tell people they need this-that-and-the-other just to get your software is a pain. Personally, I'm quite happy fetching from either git or hg, because I'm at least broadly familiar with both (more with git), but if it's something I'm *not* familiar with (cvs? Haven't used it in forever), less happy. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Question about Source Control Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-21 13:14 +1100
csiph-web