Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #68663 > unrolled thread

Re: Question about Source Control

Started byChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
First post2014-03-21 13:14 +1100
Last post2014-03-21 13:14 +1100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Question about Source Control Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-21 13:14 +1100

#68663 — Re: Question about Source Control

FromChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Date2014-03-21 13:14 +1100
SubjectRe: Question about Source Control
Message-ID<mailman.8339.1395368070.18130.python-list@python.org>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote:
> Regarding having Mercurial installed, that is very easy, and after
> you've gone (eg):
>
>   hg clone https://bitbucket.org/cameron_simpson/css my-copy-of-cameron's-css
>
> (or wherever the public repository is published), you can of course
> then walk away and work. You no longer need the public copy at all.
>
> With a DVCS the threshold is low and the advantages are high (hg
> or git; I'm an hg person myself).

Yes, it's not hard to get Mercurial. And it's not hard to get git. But
it is an extra barrier, and trying to tell people they need
this-that-and-the-other just to get your software is a pain.
Personally, I'm quite happy fetching from either git or hg, because
I'm at least broadly familiar with both (more with git), but if it's
something I'm *not* familiar with (cvs? Haven't used it in forever),
less happy.

ChrisA

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web