Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #94305
| References | <mailman.617.1437090408.3674.python-list@python.org> <d1060jF9h2gU1@mid.individual.net> <CAPTjJmp9muWvej_W7f1HgcVtvjD_5ja-+wO-LmvmA9X7Nmh09A@mail.gmail.com> <55AE8255.5000704@rece.vub.ac.be> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 03:38 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.826.1437500296.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> wrote: > On 07/19/2015 02:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Gregory Ewing >> <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > >>> Personally I'd be fine with your initial syntax, but >>> something else might be needed to get it past Guido. >>> He didn't like my 'cocall f()' construct in PEP 3152, >>> which is syntactically isomorphic to 'transfer f()'. >> >> Maybe it should get written up and rejected, then, to be something to >> point to any time anyone advocates TCO. > > Those who remember the history of pep 308 will not find > that a strong deterrent. It doesn't have to be a deterrent. It just has to say "Here's all the arguments we came up with in 2015, so find answers to those if you want to reopen the debate". It's effectively a way of rapidly onboarding the conclusions from a lengthy discussion, much more easily than pointing someone to the archive and expecting him/her to read through it all. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 09:46 +1000
Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-17 20:16 -0700
Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-07-19 11:32 +1200
Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 10:21 +1000
Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-19 12:05 -0400
Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 02:13 +1000
Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2015-07-19 17:24 +0100
Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 02:32 +1000
Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 17:41 +0100
Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 02:50 +1000
Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2015-07-21 19:33 +0200
Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 03:38 +1000
csiph-web