Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.076
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.85; 'S': 0.00; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; '22,': 0.09; 'wed,': 0.15; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'gregory': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'archive': 0.18; '>>>': 0.20; '2015': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'arguments': 0.22; 'rapidly': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'written': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'all.': 0.24; "doesn't": 0.26; 'chris': 0.26; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'fine': 0.28; 'initial': 0.28; 'pep': 0.29; "i'd": 0.31; 'anyone': 0.32; 'maybe': 0.33; 'point': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'needed': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'say': 0.37; 'someone': 0.38; "didn't": 0.39; 'easily': 0.39; 'your': 0.60; 'personally': 0.61; 'more': 0.63; 'jul': 0.72; '"here\'s': 0.84; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'conclusions': 0.84; 'construct': 0.84; 'guido.': 0.84; 'pardon': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=irh7elwdL78+hIw6bFwAdYKX3cuU6SWv8o7j2dmBzZE=; b=CJR/STzQet/SGb/XulskyL+VtXZKpkCcWQn9bu5m2xl/5FRG14uhc4PLQgVsLqbWMT pHwCIAbbQcMsFjhCwAwP78ZYRMbdOOBv0Ps+EczWay2aaFPsyDhPk8W0BPBh10QwITWG SEk8G9fcMIUg+pi1wWOtyjdaYvkV9URmObvGWzZSHxqf37Ipfiwt8e7O3Oc1NcSKF0Rv O8TKtbSpIhzkgoz24c4QR/+rLRBQxEx08DgVHClsFrvCULN0zmMVYJ0WXexkQ8fF2oMz /KBQw2HC4D9KskuIwQEBnDa72gtvVwDVm5OHiWC+SOWEeBUS+/8TzvyHBYSJi7C6tzua IHUw==
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Received	by 10.107.4.1 with SMTP id 1mr44895398ioe.10.1437500286874; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To	<55AE8255.5000704@rece.vub.ac.be>
References	<mailman.617.1437090408.3674.python-list@python.org> <d1060jF9h2gU1@mid.individual.net> <CAPTjJmp9muWvej_W7f1HgcVtvjD_5ja-+wO-LmvmA9X7Nmh09A@mail.gmail.com> <55AE8255.5000704@rece.vub.ac.be>
Date	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:38:06 +1000
Subject	Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Cc	"python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.20+
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.826.1437500296.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	25
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1437500296 news.xs4all.nl 2855 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44237
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:94305

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Antoon Pardon
<antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> wrote:
> On 07/19/2015 02:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Gregory Ewing
>> <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
>
>>> Personally I'd be fine with your initial syntax, but
>>> something else might be needed to get it past Guido.
>>> He didn't like my 'cocall f()' construct in PEP 3152,
>>> which is syntactically isomorphic to 'transfer f()'.
>>
>> Maybe it should get written up and rejected, then, to be something to
>> point to any time anyone advocates TCO.
>
> Those who remember the history of pep 308 will not find
> that a strong deterrent.

It doesn't have to be a deterrent. It just has to say "Here's all the
arguments we came up with in 2015, so find answers to those if you
want to reopen the debate". It's effectively a way of rapidly
onboarding the conclusions from a lengthy discussion, much more easily
than pointing someone to the archive and expecting him/her to read
through it all.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 09:46 +1000
  Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-17 20:16 -0700
  Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-07-19 11:32 +1200
    Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 10:21 +1000
    Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-19 12:05 -0400
    Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 02:13 +1000
    Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2015-07-19 17:24 +0100
    Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 02:32 +1000
    Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 17:41 +0100
    Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 02:50 +1000
    Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2015-07-21 19:33 +0200
    Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 03:38 +1000

csiph-web