Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #64992

Re: Try-except-finally paradox

References <9314ac52-a2be-4382-94ef-2c291f32be1a@googlegroups.com> <lcdf0c$bnl$2@ger.gmane.org>
Date 2014-01-31 00:02 +1100
Subject Re: Try-except-finally paradox
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.6130.1391086942.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> wrote:
> The finally has to happen before any return inside the try or the
>  except.  And once you're in the finally clause you'll finish it
>  before resuming the except clause.  Since it has a return,  that
>  will happen before the other returns. The one in the except block
>  will never get reached.
>
> It's the only reasonable behavior., to my mind.

It's arguable that putting a return inside a finally is unreasonable
behaviour, but that's up to the programmer. A finally clause can be
used to do what might be done in C++ with a destructor: "no matter how
this function/block exits, do this as you unwind the stack". In C++, I
might open a file like this:

void func()
{
    ofstream output("output.txt");
    // do a whole lot of stuff ...
    // at the close brace, output.~output() will be called, which will
close the file
}

In Python, the equivalent would be:

def func():
    try:
        output = open("output.txt", "w")
        # do a whole lot of stuff ...
    finally:
        output.close()

(Actually, the Python equivalent would be to use a 'with' clause for
brevity, but 'with' uses try/finally under the covers, so it comes to
the same thing.) The concept of the finally clause is: "Whether
execution runs off the end, hits a return statement, or throws an
exception, I need you do this before anything else happens". Having a
return statement inside 'finally' as well as in 'try' is a bit of a
corner case, since you're now saying "Before you finish this function
and return something, I need you to return something else", which
doesn't usually make sense. If you think Python's behaviour is
confusing, first figure out what you would expect to happen in this
situation :)

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Try-except-finally paradox Jessica Ross <deathweasel@gmail.com> - 2014-01-29 21:56 -0800
  Re: Try-except-finally paradox Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-01-29 23:23 -0700
  Re: Try-except-finally paradox Andrew Berg <robotsondrugs@gmail.com> - 2014-01-30 00:33 -0600
    Re: Try-except-finally paradox Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2014-01-30 18:12 +0000
      Re: Try-except-finally paradox Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-01-30 10:30 -0800
  Re: Try-except-finally paradox wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-01-29 22:59 -0800
  Re:Try-except-finally paradox Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-01-30 07:05 -0500
  Re: Try-except-finally paradox Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-31 00:02 +1100
  Re: Try-except-finally paradox MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-01-30 13:11 +0000
  Re: Try-except-finally paradox Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-31 00:19 +1100
  Re: Try-except-finally paradox Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-01-31 00:26 -0500
  Re: Try-except-finally paradox Göktuğ Kayaalp <self@gkayaalp.com> - 2014-02-01 03:58 +0200

csiph-web