Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #21527

Re: Raise X or Raise X()?

Show all headers | View raw

bvdp wrote:
> Which is preferred in a raise: X or X()? I've seen both. In my specific case I'm dumping out of a deep loop:
>
> try:
>   for ...
>     for ...
>       for ...
>         if match:
>            raise StopInteration()
>          else ...
>
> except StopInteration:
>    print "found it"
>   

I prefer the raise X() version, it fulfils the zen of python :

"Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.
There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it."

I still wonder why they've added the class raise form, on which purpose.

JM

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Raise X or Raise X()? bvdp <bob@mellowood.ca> - 2012-03-11 12:04 -0700
  Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-11 21:37 +0100
    Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-03-11 14:49 -0700
    Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2012-03-12 14:52 +0100
      Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-12 15:08 +0000
        Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2012-03-12 17:08 +0100
  Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-11 23:59 +0000
    Re: Raise X or Raise X()? bvdp <bob@mellowood.ca> - 2012-03-11 18:53 -0700
    Re: Raise X or Raise X()? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-03-12 02:26 +0000
  Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2012-03-12 11:37 +0100
  Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2012-03-12 12:47 +0000
  Re: Raise X or Raise X()? James Elford <fil.oracle@gmail.com> - 2012-03-12 13:06 +0000
  Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 00:13 +1100

csiph-web