Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #21527
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeeder.ewetel.de!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <prvs=411b6815e=jeanmichel@sequans.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.021 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'preferably': 0.03; 'rules.': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'both.': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python- list': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; "they've": 0.18; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.21; "aren't": 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'wonder': 0.23; 'preferred': 0.25; 'cc:2**0': 0.26; 'raise': 0.28; 'version,': 0.28; "i'm": 0.28; 'class': 0.29; 'print': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'cases': 0.32; "i've": 0.32; 'break': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'it."': 0.34; 'try:': 0.34; '...': 0.35; 'form,': 0.35; 'enough': 0.38; 'should': 0.38; 'except': 0.39; 'special': 0.66; 'fulfils': 0.84; 'it"': 0.84; 'zen': 0.84 |
| X-IronPort-AV | E=Sophos;i="4.73,570,1325458800"; d="scan'208";a="233094" |
| X-Virus-Scanned | amavisd-new at zimbra.sequans.com |
| Date | Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:37:48 +0100 |
| From | Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100328) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| To | bvdp <bob@mellowood.ca> |
| Subject | Re: Raise X or Raise X()? |
| References | <387014.2537.1331492695725.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbjv6> |
| In-Reply-To | <387014.2537.1331492695725.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbjv6> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.583.1331548677.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 24 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1331548677 news.xs4all.nl 6913 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49112 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:21527 |
Show key headers only | View raw
bvdp wrote: > Which is preferred in a raise: X or X()? I've seen both. In my specific case I'm dumping out of a deep loop: > > try: > for ... > for ... > for ... > if match: > raise StopInteration() > else ... > > except StopInteration: > print "found it" > I prefer the raise X() version, it fulfils the zen of python : "Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules. There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it." I still wonder why they've added the class raise form, on which purpose. JM
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Raise X or Raise X()? bvdp <bob@mellowood.ca> - 2012-03-11 12:04 -0700
Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2012-03-11 21:37 +0100
Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-03-11 14:49 -0700
Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2012-03-12 14:52 +0100
Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-12 15:08 +0000
Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2012-03-12 17:08 +0100
Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-11 23:59 +0000
Re: Raise X or Raise X()? bvdp <bob@mellowood.ca> - 2012-03-11 18:53 -0700
Re: Raise X or Raise X()? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-03-12 02:26 +0000
Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2012-03-12 11:37 +0100
Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2012-03-12 12:47 +0000
Re: Raise X or Raise X()? James Elford <fil.oracle@gmail.com> - 2012-03-12 13:06 +0000
Re: Raise X or Raise X()? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 00:13 +1100
csiph-web