Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #19404
| References | <4f1fd175$0$1375$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> <mailman.5068.1327487247.27778.python-list@python.org> <4f1fdb22$0$1380$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-25 11:38 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: search google with python |
| From | Jerry Hill <malaclypse2@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5079.1327509536.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Tracubik <affdfsdfdsfsd@b.com> wrote: > thanks a lot but it say it's deprecated, is there a replacement? Anyway > it'll useful for me to study json, thanks :) I don't believe Google is particularly supportive of allowing third-parties (like us) to use their search infrastructure. All of the search-related APIs they used to provide are slowly going away and not being replaced, as far as I can tell. If you just need to search images (and not Google Image Search in particular), Bing's API appears to be supported and not about to go away. ( http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd900818.aspx ) You could, in theory, make requests to Google just like a web browser and parse the resulting HTML, but that tends to be fragile and prone to break. I believe it also violates Google's Terms of Service. -- Jerry
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
search google with python Tracubik <affdfsdfdsfsd@b.com> - 2012-01-25 09:55 +0000
Re: search google with python Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-01-25 02:27 -0800
Re: search google with python Tracubik <affdfsdfdsfsd@b.com> - 2012-01-25 10:36 +0000
Re: search google with python Jerry Hill <malaclypse2@gmail.com> - 2012-01-25 11:38 -0500
Re: search google with python John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2012-01-25 12:15 -0800
csiph-web