Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #87643
| References | (2 earlier) <mailman.427.1426494675.21433.python-list@python.org> <87wq2hfibu.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <me664q$hon$1@ger.gmane.org> <CALwzid=u19YMkfJBhbLZi1qh2U9UK4ohY5wco1zO-i3T5AtyOA@mail.gmail.com> <me8ige$kjp$1@ger.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2015-03-17 09:48 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.498.1426611876.21433.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Frank Millman <frank@chagford.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. I'll try not to make that mistake again.
>
> However, to go back to the original example, we want to compare a dict
> comprehension with a dict() constructor using a generator expression.
>
> Let's see if I have got this one right -
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x=range(65, 91); y=[chr(z) for z in x]" "dict((a,
> b) for a, b in zip(x, y))"
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 49.6 usec per loop
>
> C:\>python -m timeit -s "x=range(65, 91); y=[chr(z) for z in x]" "{a: b for
> a, b in zip(x, y)}"
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 25.8 usec per loop
Why did you revert back to the no-op generator expression in the first
case instead of the more efficient dict(zip(x, y))?
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-03-16 07:25 +0200
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-15 23:22 -0700
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-03-16 10:30 +0200
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-16 01:38 -0700
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-03-16 11:01 +0200
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-16 09:57 -0600
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-16 15:41 -0700
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-03-17 08:44 +0200
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? Lele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it> - 2015-03-17 15:06 +0100
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-17 09:48 -0600
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-03-18 10:01 +0200
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-18 02:39 -0600
csiph-web