Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #87539
| From | "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? |
| Date | 2015-03-16 11:01 +0200 |
| References | <mailman.410.1426483550.21433.python-list@python.org> <87fv95fom0.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <mailman.427.1426494675.21433.python-list@python.org> <87wq2hfibu.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.432.1426496495.21433.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
"Paul Rubin" <no.email@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:87wq2hfibu.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net...
> "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> writes:
>> dict((a, b) for a, b in zip(x, y))
>> 100000 loops, best of 3: 16.1 usec per loop
>> {a: b for a, b in zip(x, y)}"
>> 100000 loops, best of 3: 6.38 usec per loop
>
> Hmm, I bet the difference is from the (a,b) consing all those tuples.
>
> Can you try just dict(zip(x,y)) ?
C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = range(65, 91); y = (chr(z) for z in x)"
"dict(zip(x, y))"
100000 loops, best of 3: 11.9 usec per loop
C:\>python -m timeit -s "x = range(65, 91); y = (chr(z) for z in x)" "{a: b
for a, b in zip(x, y)}"
100000 loops, best of 3: 7.24 usec per loop
I ran the dict comp again in case the machine load had changed - it is a bit
slower, but not much.
Frank
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-03-16 07:25 +0200
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-15 23:22 -0700
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-03-16 10:30 +0200
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-16 01:38 -0700
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-03-16 11:01 +0200
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-16 09:57 -0600
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-16 15:41 -0700
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-03-17 08:44 +0200
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? Lele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it> - 2015-03-17 15:06 +0100
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-17 09:48 -0600
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-03-18 10:01 +0200
Re: Dict comprehensions - improvement to docs? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-18 02:39 -0600
csiph-web