Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #19219
| Date | 2012-01-22 16:13 +0000 |
|---|---|
| From | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
| Subject | Re: while True or while 1 |
| References | (1 earlier) <mailman.4909.1327157944.27778.python-list@python.org> <pL-dnUjq2eH3t4bSnZ2dnUVZ5vudnZ2d@giganews.com> <mailman.4914.1327184007.27778.python-list@python.org> <4f1b9dc4$0$29987$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <pan.2012.01.22.16.05.49@tombstonezero.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4927.1327248802.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 22/01/2012 16:05, Dan Sommers wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:25:25 +0000, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > >> Or they've been writing Python code since before version 2.2 when True >> and False were introduced, and so they are used to the "while 1" idiom >> and never lost the habit. > > That would be me. > > As per a now-ancient suggestion on this mailing list (I believe it was by > Tim Peters), I've also been known to use a non-empty, literal Python > string as a self-documenting, forever-True value in the typical loop-and-a- > half cnstruct: > > while "the temperature is too big": > temperature = get_temperature() > if temperature<= threshold: > break > process_temperature(temperature) > > This way, even though the loop condition is buried inside the loop (which > could be longer than four lines), it is apparent as soon as I encounter > the loop. > And the output of "dis" shows that it's optimised to a forever loop. > With the advent of the "with" statement, though, these loops are slowly > disappearing. >
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: while True or while 1 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-01-22 01:59 +1100
Re: while True or while 1 Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> - 2012-01-21 13:13 -0800
Re: while True or while 1 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-01-22 09:13 +1100
Re: while True or while 1 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-22 05:25 +0000
Re: while True or while 1 Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2012-01-22 16:05 +0000
Re: while True or while 1 alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-01-22 19:55 -0800
Re: while True or while 1 Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-01-23 08:02 -0500
Re: while True or while 1 Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xemacs.org> - 2012-01-23 14:28 +0100
Re: while True or while 1 Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-01-23 13:33 -0500
Re: while True or while 1 MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-01-22 16:13 +0000
Re: while True or while 1 Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-23 15:51 +0000
Re: while True or while 1 Giampaolo Rodolà <g.rodola@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 17:41 +0100
Re: while True or while 1 Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> - 2012-01-23 11:12 -0800
Re: while True or while 1 Giampaolo Rodolà <g.rodola@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 21:20 +0100
Re: while True or while 1 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 10:39 -0700
Re: while True or while 1 Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> - 2012-01-23 12:05 -0600
Re: while True or while 1 Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 20:50 +0000
Re: while True or while 1 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-23 14:42 -0800
Re: while True or while 1 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-23 14:42 -0800
Re: while True or while 1 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-24 03:37 +0000
csiph-web