Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #19219

Re: while True or while 1

Date 2012-01-22 16:13 +0000
From MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
Subject Re: while True or while 1
References (1 earlier) <mailman.4909.1327157944.27778.python-list@python.org> <pL-dnUjq2eH3t4bSnZ2dnUVZ5vudnZ2d@giganews.com> <mailman.4914.1327184007.27778.python-list@python.org> <4f1b9dc4$0$29987$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <pan.2012.01.22.16.05.49@tombstonezero.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.4927.1327248802.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 22/01/2012 16:05, Dan Sommers wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:25:25 +0000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>>  Or they've been writing Python code since before version 2.2 when True
>>  and False were introduced, and so they are used to the "while 1" idiom
>>  and never lost the habit.
>
> That would be me.
>
> As per a now-ancient suggestion on this mailing list (I believe it was by
> Tim Peters), I've also been known to use a non-empty, literal Python
> string as a self-documenting, forever-True value in the typical loop-and-a-
> half cnstruct:
>
>      while "the temperature is too big":
>          temperature = get_temperature()
>          if temperature<= threshold:
>              break
>          process_temperature(temperature)
>
> This way, even though the loop condition is buried inside the loop (which
> could be longer than four lines), it is apparent as soon as I encounter
> the loop.
>
And the output of "dis" shows that it's optimised to a forever loop.

> With the advent of the "with" statement, though, these loops are slowly
> disappearing.
>

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: while True or while 1 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-01-22 01:59 +1100
  Re: while True or while 1 Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> - 2012-01-21 13:13 -0800
    Re: while True or while 1 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-01-22 09:13 +1100
      Re: while True or while 1 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-22 05:25 +0000
        Re: while True or while 1 Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2012-01-22 16:05 +0000
          Re: while True or while 1 alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-01-22 19:55 -0800
            Re: while True or while 1 Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-01-23 08:02 -0500
              Re: while True or while 1 Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xemacs.org> - 2012-01-23 14:28 +0100
                Re: while True or while 1 Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-01-23 13:33 -0500
        Re: while True or while 1 MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-01-22 16:13 +0000
    Re: while True or while 1 Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-23 15:51 +0000
    Re: while True or while 1 Giampaolo Rodolà <g.rodola@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 17:41 +0100
      Re: while True or while 1 Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> - 2012-01-23 11:12 -0800
        Re: while True or while 1 Giampaolo Rodolà <g.rodola@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 21:20 +0100
    Re: while True or while 1 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 10:39 -0700
    Re: while True or while 1 Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> - 2012-01-23 12:05 -0600
    Re: while True or while 1 Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 20:50 +0000
      Re: while True or while 1 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-23 14:42 -0800
      Re: while True or while 1 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-23 14:42 -0800
      Re: while True or while 1 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-24 03:37 +0000

csiph-web