Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #36071

Re: Can't seem to start on this

Date 2013-01-03 12:16 -0500
From "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net>
Subject Re: Can't seem to start on this
References <kc31l4$27v$1@ger.gmane.org> <20130103082031.73a5b842@dilbert> <kc439t$ehn$1@ger.gmane.org> <20130103093015.2b46908f@dilbert> <kc46bk$9bj$1@ger.gmane.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.48.1357233419.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:59:04 -0500
Kene Meniru <Kene.Meniru@illom.org> wrote:
> Yes, I guess that is the main thing. I do not want users to have to
> write python code unless they are interested in customizing how the

That works too.  It's just that you had users writing Python code but
assumed that a three line subclass was beyond them.  Not requiring them
to write any Python code is a better option than the first one (global
variables) that you proposed.  That's all I am trying to say.

> program behaves or perhaps a building component. In that case any of
> the other modules can be updated instead of "A". Actually "A" will
> not be part of the packaged program.

Or "A" becomes the script that parses the config file and runs the
other code.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net>         |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.
IM: darcy@Vex.Net

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Can't seem to start on this "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net> - 2013-01-03 12:16 -0500

csiph-web