Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #36072
| From | Kene Meniru <Kene.Meniru@illom.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Can't seem to start on this |
| Followup-To | gmane.comp.python.general |
| Date | 2013-01-03 12:36 -0500 |
| Organization | illom.org |
| References | (1 earlier) <20130103082031.73a5b842@dilbert> <kc439t$ehn$1@ger.gmane.org> <20130103093015.2b46908f@dilbert> <kc46bk$9bj$1@ger.gmane.org> <20130103121632.6af0a3e4@dilbert> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.50.1357234625.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Followups directed to: gmane.comp.python.general
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > That works too. It's just that you had users writing Python code but > assumed that a three line subclass was beyond them. Not requiring them > to write any Python code is a better option than the first one (global > variables) that you proposed. That's all I am trying to say. > I understand. >> program behaves or perhaps a building component. In that case any of >> the other modules can be updated instead of "A". Actually "A" will >> not be part of the packaged program. > > Or "A" becomes the script that parses the config file and runs the > other code. > Yes. To be more precise, later I will create "A_Interface" to provide the user with an interface for creating the contents of "A". "A_Interface" will then parse "A", calling "B" as required to create the artifact. I had wanted to jump into "A_Interface" using something like urwid or PyQt but it makes sense to work with "A" directly for now. Thanks for taking the time to understand.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Can't seem to start on this Kene Meniru <Kene.Meniru@illom.org> - 2013-01-03 12:36 -0500
csiph-web