Re: monkey patching code

From	Matt Wheeler <m@funkyhat.org>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: monkey patching __code__
Date	2016-03-21 20:42 +0000
Message-ID	<mailman.463.1458592985.12893.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References	<56EBEB5A.7050207@mail.de> <CAG93HwGKrN8y3k=3OFtHq-PbMjFzy=1U99-ZuJOLdEq69gosfg@mail.gmail.com> <56EED3DE.7050101@mail.de>

Show all headers | View raw

On 20 March 2016 at 16:46, Sven R. Kunze <srkunze@mail.de> wrote:
> On 19.03.2016 00:58, Matt Wheeler wrote:
>>
>> I know you have a working solution now with updating the code &
>> defaults of the function, but what about just injecting your function
>> into the modules that had already imported it after the
>> monkeypatching?
>>
>> Seems perhaps cleaner, unless you'd end up having to do it to lots of
>> modules...
>
> Why do you consider it cleaner?

I think it would be more explicit and understandable for someone
reading your code.

I suppose it's quite subjective :)

-- 
Matt Wheeler
http://funkyh.at

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: monkey patching __code__ Matt Wheeler <m@funkyhat.org> - 2016-03-21 20:42 +0000

csiph-web