Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #105406 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Matt Wheeler <m@funkyhat.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-21 20:42 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-03-21 20:42 +0000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: monkey patching __code__ Matt Wheeler <m@funkyhat.org> - 2016-03-21 20:42 +0000
| From | Matt Wheeler <m@funkyhat.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 20:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: monkey patching __code__ |
| Message-ID | <mailman.463.1458592985.12893.python-list@python.org> |
On 20 March 2016 at 16:46, Sven R. Kunze <srkunze@mail.de> wrote: > On 19.03.2016 00:58, Matt Wheeler wrote: >> >> I know you have a working solution now with updating the code & >> defaults of the function, but what about just injecting your function >> into the modules that had already imported it after the >> monkeypatching? >> >> Seems perhaps cleaner, unless you'd end up having to do it to lots of >> modules... > > Why do you consider it cleaner? I think it would be more explicit and understandable for someone reading your code. I suppose it's quite subjective :) -- Matt Wheeler http://funkyh.at
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web