Re: Question

From	Chris Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Question
Date	2016-03-07 19:22 +0100
Message-ID	<mailman.39.1457374969.10335.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References	<CAPZK=NPMN1JRHCNivWojp0QvQQpoh02cHbxn1VOhLnE8fg4idg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.30.1457369898.10335.python-list@python.org> <slrnndrh4r.19u.jon+usenet@wintry.unequivocal.co.uk>

Show all headers | View raw

On 7 March 2016 at 19:09, Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> wrote:
> On 2016-03-07, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Ben Morales <grupopetra2010@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I am trying to download Python but I have windows 10 and I do not see a 64
>>> bit download for my operating system. Do you have a 64 bit for windows?
>>
>> What page are you looking at?
>> https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-351/ has downloads for
>> both Windows x86 and Windows x86-64.
>
> It only appears to have downloads for 32-bit, or 64-bit AMD processors,
> not 64-bit Intel processors.
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Modern Intel processors use the amd64 (aka x86_64) architecture.
Intel’s Itanium architecture (IA-64) never really took off, and was
not supported by the consumer versions of Windows (other than XP x64).

(Not to mention 32-bit processors are sometimes called i386…i686,
where the i stands for Intel, and those processors were also
manufactured by AMD and others)

-- 
Chris Warrick <https://chriswarrick.com/>
PGP: 5EAAEA16

Thread

Re: Question Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 09:57 -0700
  Re: Question Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 18:09 +0000
    Re: Question mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 18:18 +0000
      Re: Question Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 18:51 +0000
        Re: Question Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 12:29 -0700
          Re: Question Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-03-08 01:41 +0000
            Re: Question justin walters <walters.justin01@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 17:59 -0800
              Re: Question Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-03-08 10:24 +0000
                Re: Question justin walters <walters.justin01@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 08:47 -0800
                Re: Question Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-03-08 16:53 +0000
            Re: Question Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 10:19 -0700
              Re: Question Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-03-08 17:56 +0000
                Re: Question Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 11:08 -0700
                Re: Question Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-03-08 18:08 +0000
              Re: Question Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-09 10:52 +1100
                Re: Question Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 11:13 +1100
                Re: Question Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 18:27 -0700
                Re: Question Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-03-09 12:28 +0000
                Re: Question Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-09 23:01 -0500
                Re: Question Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-03-10 11:44 +0000
                Re: Question Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-10 08:37 -0500
                Re: Question Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-03-09 12:52 +0000
        Re: Question Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 06:47 +1100
          Re: Question Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-03-08 01:33 +0000
        Re: Question Andrew Farrell <amfarrell@mit.edu> - 2016-03-07 14:00 -0600
        Re: Question justin walters <walters.justin01@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:04 -0800
    Re: Question Chris Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 19:22 +0100
    Re: Question Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:26 -0500

csiph-web