Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #49147
| References | (1 earlier) <24094189.2779.1371851333304.JavaMail.rgacote@ip-225.appropriatesolutions.com> <mailman.3701.1371923002.3114.python-list@python.org> <kqalj4$d58$1@dont-email.me> <CAMjeLr9MwFVtdDy6P3+GAksKXJ3pGSG7g-9f_4tRdAXrNpFHUg@mail.gmail.com> <kqbub9$n7n$1@ger.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-25 21:48 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: n00b question on spacing |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3809.1372160925.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> wrote: > There is quite a bit of Python's lexical analysis that is specified in > places other than the formal notation. That does not mean it is undefined. > It is well defined in the lexer code and the documentation. You suggest that > a "rule probably should be added to the lexer to make this explicit." That > is not necessary. The rule is already there. Be careful; Python is not an implementation-defined language. Python has no "lexer code" - CPython does, and is probably what you're thinking of. (There are other languages that *are* implementation-defined, meaning that it *is* correct to talk about features in that way. Python just isn't one of them.) Sometimes a rule needs to be clarified to mandate something that was previously left up to the implementation; however, if that's the case, the rule would not be added to the lexer, but to the documentation. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: n00b question on spacing Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-06-22 10:43 -0700
Re: n00b question on spacing alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-06-25 09:48 +1000
Re: n00b question on spacing Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-06-24 17:22 -0700
Re: n00b question on spacing Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-06-25 12:19 +0100
Re: n00b question on spacing Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-25 21:48 +1000
Re: n00b question on spacing Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-06-25 12:59 +0100
Re: n00b question on spacing Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-25 22:07 +1000
csiph-web