Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'cpython': 0.05; '*is*': 0.09; 'code"': 0.09; 'subject:question': 0.10; 'python': 0.11; 'suggest': 0.14; 'language.': 0.14; '(there': 0.16; 'clarified': 0.16; 'does,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'kern': 0.16; 'lexer': 0.16; 'lexical': 0.16; 'mandate': 0.16; 'notation.': 0.16; 'them.)': 0.16; 'undefined.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; "python's": 0.19; 'previously': 0.22; 'necessary.': 0.24; 'of.': 0.24; 'defined': 0.27; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'correct': 0.29; 'robert': 0.30; 'specified': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; '25,': 0.31; 'there.': 0.32; 'probably': 0.32; 'languages': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'something': 0.35; 'case,': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'sometimes': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; "you're": 0.61; 'places': 0.64; 'analysis': 0.75; '9:19': 0.84; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=YDAAILBVAjZKTphGvh9t0d1qNqgbIqMQinYdSqBzCT8=; b=JAjuRlqB9A3xNqT6oaeoMeSQXeOt1KmhSlLrlcdja8pOQL799tESAP8Da7AvFN8xFi I4pBlJsjR4KJUO11p/W4aOXq76slYtPzjWJjWLqNCnagR/IaXCuliraqBs2RYD+zWEn4 67zhut12ps02a4qSqsqb2seOfJZcm4qn3Y4+vZQw/GERTG4rv501UH0Sdy2BVsjfLJJZ iu5RbXtQlqoDl94Nnuh7TC8gKOiqPZjkd48Zn1Yc5xQzsTAIZhc5cXST/XUaiz3QO2a+ +wnHl0QQLeclYoqpml0HA3ht/+pz+LG0SLr7uqZA1yeN1rjGekNXAV8tcS4nC+nOeTL2 ottw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.48.17 with SMTP id p17mr13317047vcf.97.1372160917483; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 04:48:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <24094189.2779.1371851333304.JavaMail.rgacote@ip-225.appropriatesolutions.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:48:37 +1000 Subject: Re: n00b question on spacing From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1372160925 news.xs4all.nl 15970 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38911 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:49147 On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > There is quite a bit of Python's lexical analysis that is specified in > places other than the formal notation. That does not mean it is undefined. > It is well defined in the lexer code and the documentation. You suggest that > a "rule probably should be added to the lexer to make this explicit." That > is not necessary. The rule is already there. Be careful; Python is not an implementation-defined language. Python has no "lexer code" - CPython does, and is probably what you're thinking of. (There are other languages that *are* implementation-defined, meaning that it *is* correct to talk about features in that way. Python just isn't one of them.) Sometimes a rule needs to be clarified to mandate something that was previously left up to the implementation; however, if that's the case, the rule would not be added to the lexer, but to the documentation. ChrisA