Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #27718
| References | <8b9a5844-66b0-4940-946a-5e626462cdce@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmrcfXrbaDsdKiN=N+mRz_y1FVz5MPBAGfqVHd5Hn+thUw@mail.gmail.com> <5035F7D8.601@shopzeus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 19:30 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Guarding arithmetic |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3705.1345714240.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> wrote: >> That can work ONLY if the division of 1/0 doesn't raise an exception. >> This is why the concept of NaN exists; I'm not sure if there's a way >> to tell Python to return NaN instead of bombing, but it's most likely >> only possible with floating point, not integer. > > For integers, Python will always raise an exception when you try to divide > by zero. And integers has nothing to do with NaN. Because NaN is meaningful > for floating point numbers only. Python can be compiled to raise floating > point exceptions. (On Python 2, this is a compile time option: FPECTL. On > Python 3, this can be configured runtime: > http://docs.python.org/library/fpectl.html ) Thanks, that's the sort of thing I meant. I'm not familiar enough with Python's floating point handler to know those details. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:05 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 19:16 +1000
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:22 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 19:29 +1000
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:22 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-23 11:23 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:47 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:47 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-23 11:28 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 19:30 +1000
Re: Guarding arithmetic Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-08-23 12:11 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 10:15 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-23 13:01 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-08-23 12:21 +0100
Re: Guarding arithmetic Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-08-23 13:28 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-23 15:11 +0100
Re: Guarding arithmetic Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-23 14:49 -0400
Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 07:48 +1000
csiph-web