Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #27721
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Guarding arithmetic |
| Date | 2012-08-23 12:11 +0200 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <8b9a5844-66b0-4940-946a-5e626462cdce@googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3707.1345716686.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Mark Carter wrote: > Suppose I want to define a function "safe", which returns the argument > passed if there is no error, and 42 if there is one. So the setup is > something like: > > def safe(x): > # WHAT WOULD DEFINE HERE? > > print safe(666) # prints 666 > print safe(1/0) # prints 42 > > I don't see how such a function could be defined. Is it possible? 1/0 is evaluated before safe() is called. Therefore safe() has no chance to catch the exception. You have to move the evaluation into the safe() function: >>> def safe(deferred, default=42, exception=Exception): ... try: ... return deferred() ... except exception: ... return default ... >>> print safe(lambda: 666) 666 >>> print safe(lambda: 1/0) 42
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:05 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 19:16 +1000
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:22 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 19:29 +1000
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:22 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-23 11:23 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:47 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:47 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-23 11:28 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 19:30 +1000
Re: Guarding arithmetic Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-08-23 12:11 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 10:15 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-23 13:01 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-08-23 12:21 +0100
Re: Guarding arithmetic Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-08-23 13:28 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-23 15:11 +0100
Re: Guarding arithmetic Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-23 14:49 -0400
Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 07:48 +1000
csiph-web