Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #27714

Re: Guarding arithmetic

Show all headers | View raw

On 2012-08-23 11:05, Mark Carter wrote:
> Suppose I want to define a function "safe", which returns the argument passed if there is no error, and 42 if there is one. So the setup is something like:
>
> def safe(x):
>     # WHAT WOULD DEFINE HERE?
>
> print safe(666) # prints 666
> print safe(1/0) # prints 42
>
> I don't see how such a function could be defined. Is it possible?
You are very vague. "There is an error" - but what kind of error? To 
catch all possible exceptions you could do:

def unsafe(x):
     # put your code here...

def safe(x):
     try:
         return unsafe(x)
     except:
         return 42

Generally, it is a bad idea. Exception handlers were invented because 
they give you a way to handle any error in the call chain. When an 
exception occurs, the interpreter will start searching for an 
appropriate exception handler traversing up in the call chain. By 
converting exceptions into return values, you are bypassing this search. 
Then you will have to write conditions instead of exception handlers 
inside ALL methods in the call chain, creating a "manual" search for the 
handler of the exception. In most cases, this will make your code 
difficult, error prone and hard to read.

In some special cases, this can be a good idea to do.

Can you please let us know when and how would you like to use it?

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:05 -0700
  Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 19:16 +1000
    Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:22 -0700
    Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 19:29 +1000
    Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:22 -0700
  Re: Guarding arithmetic Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-23 11:23 +0200
    Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:47 -0700
    Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:47 -0700
  Re: Guarding arithmetic Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-23 11:28 +0200
  Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 19:30 +1000
  Re: Guarding arithmetic Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-08-23 12:11 +0200
    Re: Guarding arithmetic rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 10:15 -0700
  Re: Guarding arithmetic Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-23 13:01 +0200
  Re: Guarding arithmetic MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-08-23 12:21 +0100
  Re: Guarding arithmetic Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-08-23 13:28 +0200
  Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-23 15:11 +0100
  Re: Guarding arithmetic Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-23 14:49 -0400
  Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 07:48 +1000

csiph-web