Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #32933

Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization

References (7 earlier) <mailman.3343.1352242047.27098.python-list@python.org> <5099bf7d$0$29980$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <509ADA6E.10403@r3dsolutions.com> <CALwzidmkGMH0qXCAa=24-=Nej+CJ0asDMFKZbFxuXfcpzC=emA@mail.gmail.com> <509B2355.60407@r3dsolutions.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date 2012-11-08 00:09 -0700
Subject Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3422.1352358609.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Andrew Robinson
<andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> wrote:
> OK, and is this a main use case?  (I'm not saying it isn't I'm asking.)

I have no idea what is a "main" use case.

> There is a special keyword which signals the new type of comprehension;  A
> normal comprehension would say eg: '[ foo for i in xrange ]'; but when the
> 'for i in' is reduced to a specific keyword such as 'ini' (instead of
> problematic 'in') the caching form of list comprehension would start.

FYI, the Python devs are not very fond of adding new keywords.  Any
time a new keyword is added, existing code that uses that word as a
name is broken.  'ini' is particularly bad, because 1) it's not a
word, and 2) it's the name of a common type of configuration file and
is probably frequently used as a variable name in relation to such
files.

> So, then, just like a comprehension -- the interpreter will begin to
> evaluate the code from the opening bracket '['; But anything other than a
> function/method will raise a type error (people might want to change that,
> but it's safe).
>
> The interpreter then caches all functions/initialiser methods it comes into
> contact with.
> Since every function/method has a parameter list (even if empty);  The
> interpreter would evaluate the parameter list on the first pass through the
> comprehension, and cache each parameter list with it's respective function.
>
> When the 'ini' keyword is parsed a second time, Python would then evaluate
> each cached function on its cached parameter list; and the result would be
> stored in the created list.
> This cached execution would be repeated as many times as is needed.
>
> Now, for your example:
>
> values = zip(samples, times * num_groups)
>     if len(values) < len(times) * num_groups:
>         # raise an error
>
> Might be done with:
>
> values = zip(   samples, [ lambda:times, ini xrange(num_groups) ]   )
>
>     if len(values) < len(times) * num_groups
>
> The comma after the lambda is questionable, and this construction would be
> slower since lambda automatically invokes the interpreter; but it's correct.

How is this any better than the ordinary list comprehension I already
suggested as a replacement?  For that matter, how is this any better
than list multiplication?  Your basic complaint about list
multiplication as I understand it is that the non-copying semantics
are unintuitive.  Well, the above is even less intuitive.  It is
excessively complicated and almost completely opaque.  If I were to
come across it outside the context of this thread, I would have no
idea what it is meant to be doing.

> As an aside, how would you do the lambda inside a list comprehension?

As a general rule, I wouldn't.  I would use map instead.

> [lambda:6 for i in xrange(10) ] # Nope.

Thak constructs a list of 10 functions and never calls them.  If you
want to actually call the lambda, then:

[(lambda: 6)() for i in range(10)]

or:

map(lambda i: 6, range(10))

But note that the former creates equivalent 10 functions and calls
each of them once, whereas the latter creates one function and calls
it ten times.

>> Of course you got an integer. You took an index of the range object, not a
>> slice. The rule is that taking an index of a sequence returns an element;
>> taking a slice of a sequence returns a sub-sequence. You still have not
>> shown any inconsistency here.
>
>
> Because it's an arbitrary rule which operates differently than the
> traditional idea shown in python docs?
>
> slice.indices()  is *for* (QUOTE)"representing the set of indices specified
> by range(start, stop, step)"
> http://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html#slice

slice.indices() has nothing to do with it.  Indexing a sequence and
calling the .indices() method on a slice are entirely different
operations.  The slice.indices method is a utility method meant to be
called by __getitem__ implementations when doing slicing, not an
implementation of indexing.  When a sequence is indexed, there is no
slice.  That method is not related in any way to the semantics of
indexing a sequence.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Multi-dimensional list initialization Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-11-04 22:27 -0800
  Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2012-11-05 10:13 +0100
    Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2012-11-06 01:32 +0000
    Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-11-06 13:01 +1100
    Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2012-11-06 02:30 +0000
    Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-11-05 21:51 -0800
      Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-06 09:04 +0000
        RE: Multi-dimensional list initialization "Shambhu Rajak" <shambhu.rajak@calsoftinc.com> - 2012-11-06 18:57 +0530
        Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-11-06 14:41 -0800
          Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-07 01:55 +0000
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-11-06 22:56 -0800
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2012-11-07 00:57 -0800
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-11-07 22:27 +0000
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-07 16:39 -0700
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-08 00:09 -0700
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-08 08:58 -0700
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-11-09 01:39 +0000
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-11-09 17:07 +1100
              Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-09 06:37 +0000
                Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-11-09 17:59 +1100
                Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-11-09 07:27 +0000
                Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-11-09 07:05 -0800
                Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-11-10 02:23 +1100
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-11-09 14:34 -0500
            RE: Multi-dimensional list initialization "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-11-09 20:31 +0000
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-11-09 13:49 -0800
        RE: Multi-dimensional list initialization "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-11-06 23:39 +0000
        Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-06 16:52 -0700
        Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-11-07 00:23 +0000
          Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-11-06 20:11 -0800
          Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-07 05:05 +0000
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-11-07 00:12 -0500
              Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2012-11-07 18:32 +1300
                RE: Multi-dimensional list initialization "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-11-07 15:57 +0000
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2012-11-07 10:52 +0200
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-11-07 17:17 +0000
              Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-07 22:36 +0000
        Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-11-07 07:23 -0800
        Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-07 14:01 -0700
          Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-08 00:00 +0000
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2012-11-08 00:30 +0000
              Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-08 03:47 +0000
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-11-07 20:51 -0800
            Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization wrw@mac.com - 2012-11-08 08:26 -0500
        Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-11-07 16:24 -0800
          Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-08 04:20 +0000
    Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-11-06 17:07 +1100
    Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-11-06 00:21 -0800
    Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-06 02:19 -0700
    RE: Multi-dimensional list initialization "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-11-06 17:32 +0000
    Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-11-06 13:14 -0800
    Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-11-06 13:19 -0800
    Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-06 15:46 -0700
      Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2012-11-07 18:34 +1300
        Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2012-11-07 14:00 +0000
        Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-11-07 06:47 -0800
        Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2012-11-07 23:06 +0000
        Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization Greg Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2012-11-08 14:29 +1300
  Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2012-11-05 01:55 -0800

csiph-web