Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #41037
| Date | 2013-03-10 16:42 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Mitya Sirenef <msirenef@lightbird.net> |
| Subject | Re: Switch statement |
| References | <assp.0781b21545.f529f94d99404cefa9b832ebf57d2898@exch.activenetwerx.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3166.1362948152.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 03/10/2013 10:16 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I have a switch statement composed using a dict:
>
>
> switch = {
> 'a': func_a,
> 'b': func_b,
> 'c': func_c
> }
> switch.get(var, default)()
>
>
> As a result of multiple functions per choice, it migrated to:
>
>
>
> switch = {
> 'a': (func_a1, func_a2),
> 'b': (func_b1, func_b2),
> 'c': (func_c, )
> }
>
>
>
> for f in switch.get(var, (default, )):
> f()
>
>
> As a result of only some of the functions now requiring unique
arguments, I presume this
> needs to be migrated to a if/else statement? Is there a way to
maintain the switch style with
> the ability in this scenario to cleanly pass args only to some functions?
>
>
> Thanks,
> jlc
You can have two dictionaries; you can also add a flag:
'a': (WITHARG, funca1, funca2)
-m
--
Lark's Tongue Guide to Python: http://lightbird.net/larks/
The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity.
Dorothy Parker
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Switch statement Mitya Sirenef <msirenef@lightbird.net> - 2013-03-10 16:42 -0400
csiph-web