Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!194.134.4.91.MISMATCH!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'args': 0.04; 'cure': 0.07; 'arguments,': 0.09; 'python:': 0.09; 'cleanly': 0.16; 'presume': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86.74': 0.16; 'received:smtp.webfaction.com': 0.16; 'received:webfaction.com': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'thanks,': 0.18; 'statement': 0.23; 'pass': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'switch': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'requiring': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'add': 0.36; 'ability': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40 Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:42:24 -0400 From: Mitya Sirenef User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Switch statement References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 50 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1362948152 news.xs4all.nl 6943 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:34065 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:41037 On 03/10/2013 10:16 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I have a switch statement composed using a dict: > > > switch = { > 'a': func_a, > 'b': func_b, > 'c': func_c > } > switch.get(var, default)() > > > As a result of multiple functions per choice, it migrated to: > > > > switch = { > 'a': (func_a1, func_a2), > 'b': (func_b1, func_b2), > 'c': (func_c, ) > } > > > > for f in switch.get(var, (default, )): > f() > > > As a result of only some of the functions now requiring unique arguments, I presume this > needs to be migrated to a if/else statement? Is there a way to maintain the switch style with > the ability in this scenario to cleanly pass args only to some functions? > > > Thanks, > jlc You can have two dictionaries; you can also add a flag: 'a': (WITHARG, funca1, funca2) -m -- Lark's Tongue Guide to Python: http://lightbird.net/larks/ The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity. Dorothy Parker